He See's Someones Cards

[pokerponcho]

Even so, it is still collusion. The information is collaborated. Whether he wispers it to his friend or whether he peaks, or whether it''s "magic" is not relevant. Saying that it's sneaking a peak is logical because:

1) The "sucker" is unaware.

2) The cheater knows exactly what the sucker has.

Acting on this tell is not always logical because:

1) It is unethical as violates some of the collaborative ethics of the game.

2) It is unreliable as you do not know what the cheater is thinking.

It's a risky thing to do. One misread, and you get slaughtered. That's why I recommend a tight/aggressive strategy against the cheater. There are several reasons to do it this way:

1) The cheater won't catch on so easily.

2) Re-raising him occasional will put him to the test.

3) This is the way that we play poker. This is the way that we make the most money.

4) Pigs get slaughtered.