Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > General Poker Discussion > News, Views, and Gossip
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #30  
Old 11-03-2006, 12:41 PM
NoSoup4U NoSoup4U is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 260
Default Re: Gold responds in some detail to allegations

[ QUOTE ]
That's why this case might hinge on the nature of his agreement with Bodog, and whether there was ever any agreement for Leyser to procure celebrities.

[/ QUOTE ]

The interesting thing is that it isn't strictly required that Gold had to procure celebs in exchange for his seat. All that is really required is that Gold promised half his prize in exchange for those celebs to Leyser and they agreed. Obviously, if Gold wasn't required to provide them, that makes it more difficult for Leyser to prove it, but as they say in Contracts 101 the court doesn't get into questions of the sufficiency of the consideration.

It occurs to me that I picked up a lot just being AROUND law school.

Its also funny to me how often TV and public perception about the law revolve around completely different decision points than real cases usually do.
Reply With Quote
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:54 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.