Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > General Poker Discussion > Poker Theory
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #13  
Old 11-01-2006, 06:32 PM
FortunaMaximus FortunaMaximus is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Golden Horseshoe
Posts: 6,606
Default Re: Daniel Negreneau Verifies His Agreement With Me

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Of all theortical opponents, I think that kind of limpaggro opponent is the hardest to adjust to and play against, especially since it's incredibly difficult to induce mistakes from him postflop.

[/ QUOTE ]

Honestly I can't see how any decent TAG can lose to it. Its a strategy designed to extract the absolute max from the donks at the table who will just always fold no pair/no draw but will lose their stack if their top pair is beat. Its not designed to baffle the TAGs. If its me, DanN., a couple other good players and the rest donks at the tournament table, DanN. will get the most chips because he's the best player and knows how to extract from the donks better than anyone. However, I believe I would be making money from DN being at the table simply because I'm making solid preflop reraises picking off all that crap he plays. I don't care how good of a player he is, I'll take my 20% of hands range against his 70%+ any day of the week as long as I'm playing aggressively and reasonably unpredictably.

[/ QUOTE ]

"A decent TAG who plays aggressively and unpredictably."

What are you gonna do, pull a KP on him? [img]/images/graemlins/tongue.gif[/img] Anticipated and acccounted for in the strategy, btw.
Reply With Quote
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:32 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.