|
|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: If you are a VIP what limits do you play? | |||
| .50/1 |
   
|
0 | 0% |
| 1/2 |
  
|
1 | 0.88% |
| 2/4 |
  
|
6 | 5.31% |
| 3/6 |
  
|
11 | 9.73% |
| 5/10 |
  
|
14 | 12.39% |
| 10/20 |
  
|
8 | 7.08% |
| 15/30 |
|
4 | 3.54% |
| 20/40 |
|
7 | 6.19% |
| 30/60 |
|
7 | 6.19% |
| no limit |
|
14 | 12.39% |
| I'm not VIP |
|
41 | 36.28% |
| Voters: 113. You may not vote on this poll | |||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#5
10-29-2006, 04:04 AM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Big hand vs. Allen Cunningham
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Sorry this hand seems totally absurd to me, when you put him on such a ridiculous tight range facing an open cutoff min steal raise with all these antes in the pot. [/ QUOTE ] Because over the first 6 hours of the day he has redefined the term 'nit.' He has played less than 5% of the hands including those where people min bet against his blinds. These were my reads at the time; he could have been card dead for 6 hours but I think that my evaluation of his play is accurate. The read could have certaintly been incorrect but if there was one player at the table who I was studying closely the entire day it was Cunningham. He was the big stack at the table all day and I wanted to be careful to get any information that I could on his play since he was in position against me. I watched everything that he did on every hand and this was my read [/ QUOTE ] Fiji -- See above. Another bizarre and completely untenable facet of your analysis is that you seem to think that Cunningham is unaware of the fact that you have seen him fold a lot in the last six hours. --Nate 
|
|
|
Threaded Mode