Heisman odds

[sfwusc]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
No way someone from ta weakass conf., esepcially with that cream puff schedule, is going to get the votes. He may be a finalists, but he doesn't have a shot in hell of winning.

[/ QUOTE ]

I didnt say USC schedule was cream puff. I just said N. Illois schedule wasn't cream puff. The SEC is insane, and USC last year would have lost a game in the regular season playing in the SEC. PAC 10 might be better than it is given credit for, and is likely 3rd in the BCS conferences.

-SFWUSC

Yea Ohio State and Iowa suck. USC schedule last year looked about as hard, and Bush won. Not saying it is exactly the same thing, but the schedule isnt going to be a reason for him not to win. Not enough media hype might be a better reason for him not to win. There was a ton of value at +6000.

I will pass at +1800.

-SFWUSC

http://sports.yahoo.com/ncaaf/teams/nns/schedule

[/ QUOTE ]

Look up the Sagarin Rankings...

Lets post some random ones and guess which is which....

78.37( 8)
73.42( 50)
77.10( 14)
76.40( 20)

USC
ND
LSU
Temple

Yes, it includes bowl games. Yes, Sagarin has flaws. Creampuff hardly. Pac10 is as underrated as the SEC is overrated. And almost all BCS conferences in terms of Heisman contention are viewed fairly closely. Wolfe from the MAC obviously has the hardest road to go through.

[/ QUOTE ]