Lee Jones Flawed Thinking

[PokerHorse]

Although I agree with you Micro, i do believe that Davids point that authors in this field seem to feel that they can get away with publishing theory without really understanding fully what they are writing about, is correct and there really is no middle ground.
Over the years reading this forum I have found myself feeling like you do as to how Mason and sometimes David respond to situations, but its easy to feel this way ,since we are simply the ones benefitting from their hard work.
I have come full circle in my feelings about these guys.
We have to feel lucky that they are in our corner making sure that we get correct information. I used to think that it was just them trying to protect their own profits, but i'm convinced that it is not the case.
they have worked very hard to make sure that the material that they publish is correct, and i can see how frustrating it can be for a "Scientist", to see other people posing as scientists making false claims with incorrect logic.
If you have read any of my posts, you know Im not a kiss ass to these guys, b ut as abrasive as they seem sometimes we should realize what they have done for poker.
lee jones has no business writing about poker, as well as my child hood friend johnny Vorhaus, and others.
Thats why I just had to post something about Kill phill because its basically the ONLY BOOK OUTSIDE OF 2PLUS2 that is any good. and its very good. good luck