Re: Risked $100, made $684 PROFIT--no work--autoplay
Sorry you don't like the layout of my site [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img] Hopefully I am better at finding bonuses and whoring advice than web site design.
While there is no reason you have to do them together, as Brendan mentioned, I mainly paired the 2 together for a couple of reasons. First was that this was the first non-conventional bonus I have covered (i.e. not just deposit and grind out). Because of this fact, I wanted to "ease" my readers into sticky type strategies rather than just start telling people to start betting $25 a hand on every bonus. Second, I always try to make sure the math on the EV behind my reviews is sound and wherever possible I like to quantify the risk and reward behind a strategy. Positioning the pair as having 25% combined risk of busting gets more folks to try a stickyish strategy than would have otherwise. Playing the two bonuses as a pair clearly increases the EV compared to playing them alone. Is it groundbreaking in a quantum physics sort of way, probably not, but I do think analzying bonuses in tandem to maximize EV hasn't been done often, and has some nice byproducts. The typical "sticky strategies" most sites present (Bet big until you hit a target, then grind) seemed too generic and prone to error so I was trying to come up with something more predictable EV wise, variance wise and risk wise.
Halo7
|