![]() |
|
#19
|
|||
|
|||
|
ZB,
[ QUOTE ] While you and many others here now have an intense interest in the legislation issue and have been following same in this forum recently, many of us have been following from the beginning of this forum. As such, we recognize who are the legit posters with insider knowledge, and what characteristics new posters who profess same are likely to have if they are legit. You simply aren't able to recognize those things. [/ QUOTE ] First of all, don't talk about [censored] you know nothing about. I have been an active reader of this forum for a very very long time. It doesn't require you to post in order to read posts. Secondly, who made you the expert on this topic? [ QUOTE ] If you were able to, you would have noticed that this guy has just been hyping himself, making unsubstantiated claims, and acting as if news he has given is insider info, when in reality it is virtually certain to have been just an edited version of late-breaking news from respectable news sources that cover congress. [/ QUOTE ] Honestly. I don't [censored] care. His information on the happenings going on haven't been anymore or any less informative than any other source. Every [censored] time ANYTHING happens we see 5 different stories from 5 different sources saying 5 different things. The Hill posted that he snuck the IG Bill into the DoD bill, are they untrustworthy now? Please let me know, since you are apparently the expert on trustworthy posters. After all, your older than me, and have been reading the forum for a long time. That's a strong resume. [ QUOTE ] And far from harming this forum, I am attempting to help it determine who is an individual or organization worthy of our support. To that end, I have asked nrog some questions in the other threads, about which he has not been very forthcoming. In particular, his claims to be using lobbyists and relaying the info from same just hasn't seen a thread of authentication. When he can easily as I noted above just state who his lobbyists so that can be verified. [/ QUOTE ] Who freaking cares? He gets info, and comes to tell us about it. We take his info, info from PPA, info from The Hill, info from AP, info from Reuters, info from Mr K/Berge/Nate/random dudes and we compile it all. We analyze it to get the most out of it. The more the merrier. He hasn't posted a single thing out of line, and has in fact been right against several "well known" online newspapers and magazines. [ QUOTE ] And a larger point here as well, is that many of you younger guys who might be excellent poker players just lack the real world experience and knowledge of hustlers, liars and conmen that many of us older guys have seen a thousand times over. In other words, you are naive suckers. Maybe you think that just isn't possible, but there are plenty of top players who are suckers in other areas of gambling, women or life. And the willingness of yourself and many others here to accept a n00b poster's uncorroborated and self-promoting statements which on occasion have been erroneous (and which he refuses to acknowledge), driven no doubt by your fear of this legislative threat, proves that this is so. [/ QUOTE ] This is just a ridiculous statement. You plant a judgement on me based on absolutely nothing. You know nothing about me, my political background, my legislation background, my naiveness, my life experience or anything else. You make yourself look like a complete [censored] moron. Keep running your mouth please, even less people will listen. |
|
|