![]() |
|
#31
|
|||
|
|||
|
All advantage gamblers have two things in common: they are money-loving and risk-averse. We are not argue this, right? When such a person is offered to make a 2% +EV or a 5% +EV bet, and choose the stakes, he will find the stakes at which this bet is optimal for him. (Optimal bet will be Kelly bankroll * percent advantage). The answer will never be: "you can take the bet and shove it", unless making the bet is inconvenient in some way.
[ QUOTE ] Yep. You're basically telling people that their utility functions are "wrong." You're advancing a "HEDGERS ARE ALL PU$$IES!!11!" argument and dressing it up in academic-sounding language. [/ QUOTE ] I don't think pzhon called you a pu$$y, more like an irrational [censored]. |
|
|