100NL weak set laydown?

[pokerman37]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
obviously i put him on aces here

[/ QUOTE ]

If that really is the case, why did you call?

Given the check/call and then the check/bet, I'd say he has an ace...if he has aces, God bless him, but I'd hope for AK and check raise all in

[/ QUOTE ]

I called p/f for set value. I called the flop because kings or queens would bet this flop when checked too. Now when he bets the turn, i think kings or queens would check behind here.


[ QUOTE ]
If the ace on the flop were a king, would you weak tighties think he flopped a set of kings and fold?

20/6 is not good enough to make me think this is ONLY aces...and it's not close

[/ QUOTE ]

If the flop was a king, i would have pushed, because i beat aces. The difference between the ace high flop and a king high flop is that the ace is a scare card for any hands that i beat (assuming he doesnt have AK, which im quite sure he doesn't based on his previous play), and when he continues agression on the turn, well he just doesn't seem scared of that ace. If it was a king i would push the turn if he followed the same line, because it now opens his range up, as he would do this with aces. Im not saying im correct, but these are my thoughts, feel free to correct me here.