Isolating with the Gigabet Dilemma (long)

[Freudian]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
You asked me for an example of risky play that led eventually to your exit. I gave you one. If you don't even concede it is a risky play it is pointless discussing.

[/ QUOTE ]
Then it's pointless. While there's certainly risk involved it appeared that it was at worst a neutral EV decision if not slightly +EV. Since he was compensated for the risk your only argument is that he shouldn't make what he thinks is a +EV call. This decision simply just doesn't apply to what we're trying to discuss here.

[/ QUOTE ]

Of course it is pointless. I said so in my original post. No matter what example I give Giga could say he had a read that motivated the play. He got involved in even more marginal spots with even worse hands during the final two days of that event but posting them will only yeild a very predictible answer.

He made a request. I found a hand fitting the request, finding a high risk play leading to the exit. Not for pot odds discussion but for metagame discussion since that is what the OP is about. But as predicted it was a waste of time.