Harrahs New Orleans - Trip Report (Bitter) - With an Interesting Rule

[bav]

I'm with the crowd that's never seen a game's limits change so long as a single player objected. Every player has always had veto power over all such changes anytime I've seen it done. But yeah, the practical matter is if 9 people at the table wanted to change limits, and you were the only dissenter, they could have just opened a new table, 9 people woulda moved, and you would have been left by yourself on the old table. So the end result was the same and this way was far more efficient.

[ QUOTE ]
I have never heard of a casino comping ATM fees. Is this SOP at most places? Why wouldn't they just have no service charge on the ATM's (which I assume they own).

[/ QUOTE ]

I think his point is he spent money on ATM fees so he could play pokah, and then they went and killed the game he was in so he thinks they should compensate him.

No... I don't buy that. You could have brought cash to the casino and avoided any ATM fees. Plus you'd already lost all but $200, so you got your money's worth. I don't see comping you for ATM fees in this case. It's not the casino's fault you chose an expensive means of getting cash.

But I could see comping you for the last time charge if the game changed shortly after the half-hour. It's not very fair for them to bill you a time charge, then 5 minutes later nuke the game.