![]() |
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
[ QUOTE ]
Hi. I tried this software out for the first time today and think it's fantastic and full of potential. [/ QUOTE ] Cool. Glad you like it. [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img] [ QUOTE ] I read the entire thread, so I won't be repeating what's already been mentioned. My suggestions all have to do with the way sorting table lists work. One change I'd like to see that no one else has mentioned yet is progressive sorting. I probably made up the term, but what I mean is, if I first decide to sort the table list by "VP$P" and then select to sort by "players", as it stands now, SS will list all the tables with 6 players at the top randomly, but pay no attention to my previous sorting option. Ideally, it would list with priority based on my previous sorting options. So I would sort by "VPIP" and then by "players", and end up with a list of full tables from highest vpip to lowest vpip followed by a list of tables with 5 players, again, these sorted from highest vpip to lowest vpip and so on. [/ QUOTE ] That's a feature I could add. But its low priority, because with single column sorting and the current table filter you can mostly do that now. [ QUOTE ] I would also love to be able to play around with the way table averages are calculated. For example, I would like to be able to have my table list show the average VPIP of the 2 players with the highest VPIP rather than an average of all of them (or top 3, or top 1... ideally with a minimum hand requirement for the listing). This way, I can quickly find the fishiest players which may not be sitting at the "fishiest" tables if the rest of the table is playing very tight. Cheers for now. Pogo [/ QUOTE ] You can accomplish this now using the Custom Scoring rules. See our site FAQ for details. You could add a rule like (NumHands > 100) and (VPIP between 40 and 50) score is 45, i.e. only score the high VPIP's which is what you want I think. Then you can sort the grid by User score. -Ben |
|
|