![]() |
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] as soon as I typed that, I knew someone was going to say Lopez, but that was an anamoly, and as you said, clearly not applicable here. [/ QUOTE ]sorry, i sort of had a flashback to law school. i was sort of being a gunner there, and i apologize. i did not like those people in law school. [/ QUOTE ] no problem, in any event, i am sure we both agree that this bill implicates interstate commerce more than many laws that have been passed under the guise of commerce. [/ QUOTE ]Clearly. There is no absolutely no way that a Court would strike it down on Constitutional grounds, absent open corruption. Furthermore, I would not want a Court do so, as I would not want to live in a country where the Courts could overturn such laws (even though I dearly love internet gambling). |
|
|