Open letter to Censored

[Evan]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
I didn't "jump" on LoL's post. I like what she writes for the most part. I do not like being lectured on a topic I'm knowledgable in by someone that is not, or has not proven that they are. Maybe LoL knows more about poker than i give her credit for, but until she shows that the post I responded to will remain an annoyance to me as it provides little cognative thought and lots of repeating what sounds like a marketing pamphlet.

If I'm a tool it's not for that post.

[/ QUOTE ]

Perhaps your problem is that you assumed her post was written FOR you, when it was likely not. Perhaps your problem is you don't realize that you're not the center of the universe. One thing I am fairly certain of: you will respond to this post within 5 minutes with some lame one line response that disagrees with it.

[/ QUOTE ]
Looks like you were wrong on both accounts, as this post will certainly stretch two lines on all but the widest of monitors. Her post was written for people critiquing the 2+2 business, which were by and large people familiar with the 2+2 business and the industry in which it operates. To that extent it was written for "me", the figurative "me", of course, as I agree that I am not massive enough for the universe to revolve around.

I'm not sure why this all makes me a tool. I don't dislike LoL and as far as I know, though with no degree of certainty, she does not dislike me. Maybe she does of course, Elaine does and she said they often have similar opinions. Ed used to not dislike me, but I can't imagine my opinions of or interaction with his wife have done much for the evanpinion much in the Miller household. Either way, I don't see what of that encouraged you to dislike me on behalf of her.

It's too bad, I suppose, but as it stands there is likely little I could do short of recanting what I feel was a reasonable response to an unreasonable post. Oh well, please don't tell too many people that I'm a tool. I'm kind of a big deal around here.