![]() |
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] best post of the thread. I also agree with sublime's general sentiments. If some random GUY (or semi well-known guy) came on here and said that they consistently beat the mid-high stakes games and then went on about this one time in which they observed there were more deuces hitting the flop of late so they decided that there was an increased chance of hitting their set somehow then there is about ZERO chance the reaction would be as positive for them as it has been to Ms. Gluck. She's been very nice and tolerant of some of the criticism and vulgarity she's had to put up with in this thread. but saying that she had a feeling a deuce was going to hit and actually saying that playing such hunches is a good way to play sounds borderline-Hellmuthian to me. [/ QUOTE ] I think this is the 5th time already Bob....but I will say it again, I'm not trying to teach anybody. I shared how I played a hand because I was asked. I could care less what you think of it mathematically. I won't call a raise with 33 in my small blind, but we are not talking about that are we? I have been successful at playing my way and no one elses, and I will continue. [/ QUOTE ] I don't believe I said you were trying to teach anybody. you say you are just relating how and why you played a certain hand. Some of the posters are telling you that they think that playing such 'rushes of deuces' is kind of dumb. And I'm also adding that more people around here would be showing their agreement with this if you were a dude. |
|
|