![]() |
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
[ QUOTE ]
My opinion, briefly: 1) Lee's fronting up, and his response, show class. 2) But that's all. He assures us that their organisation is now able to handle this issue properly. If we'd asked him the same thing a week ago, he would have said the same thing. There is no review process that we have access to (Lee's description of their review process was entirely internal). There is no one we can email if we have troubles, etc. In short, all he's said is, "we messed up, we apologise, and we will try not to do it again." When they do do it again (which will certainly happen sooner or later, as people make mistakes), what does the victim do? I'm just glad I'm a 2+2 member. [/ QUOTE ] That's all true, yet there comes a point where we have to accept our gains and realize that getting more will take time. Acknowledge that Stars acted responsibly once 2+2 got involved, take the apologies at face value unless there comes a reason not to. I have followed the issue without involvement until now. IMHO the only people that came out badly were a couple of immature 2+2'ers, and Granny. |
|
|