![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Given the poor quality of most $22 sit and goers, I question how +EV it is to apply correct bubble strategy in certain situations.
Let's take this situation for example. I had been playing typical tight aggro mostly push/fold since 50/100, pushing some marginal holdings but very few outright steals. BB is a moron table coach tight passive berater. PokerStars Tournament, Big Blind is t200 (4 handed) Converter on pregopoker.com CO (t1070) Button (t5382) Hero (t4785) BB (t2263) Preflop: Hero is in SB with 2[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] 5[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] <font color="gray">CO folds</font>, <font color="gray">Button folds</font>, <font color="red">Hero raises to t4785 (All-in)</font>, BB calls t2063 (All-in) I'd say BB needs 77-AA to call here. He showed KQ and took the pot. How do you adjust your bubble strat for idiots? Is it as simple as just adjusting your calling ranges downwards? Or do you continue to push any 2 and let them make the horrible calls and take the -EV that comes with it? |
|
|