Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > PL/NL Texas Hold'em > Medium Stakes
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old 10-01-2007, 11:41 AM
FionnMac FionnMac is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,922
Default Re: Slightly lost with oesd in 3-bet pot

[ QUOTE ]
350-75=275

275/800= 0.34 = bet/call

[/ QUOTE ]

thanks, so this is def +EV, but if he is calling or shoving with90% of his range (he's certainly not calling a 3-bet oop with suited connectors or low pp's) could checking be more +EV?
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 10-01-2007, 11:45 AM
olof86 olof86 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Sweden
Posts: 557
Default Re: Slightly lost with oesd in 3-bet pot

With that read of yours just fold preflop? As for the question above, do some math.. but since everyone seem to bet this flop I wouldn't even think about any other alternative.
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 10-01-2007, 11:52 AM
Veron Veron is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Holland
Posts: 590
Default Re: Slightly lost with oesd in 3-bet pot

If you think his range is as tight as you say it is, then this is a super easy check behind.

However if you figure his range is wide enough that you have some fold equity on this board then bet like 80% pot and call a shove.
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 10-01-2007, 11:59 AM
lassie lassie is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 371
Default Re: Slightly lost with oesd in 3-bet pot

Bet whatever amount you'd bet with a big pair here and snapcall a shove.
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 10-01-2007, 01:48 PM
ogdundar ogdundar is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 470
Default Re: Slightly lost with oesd in 3-bet pot

If he is that tight preflop, WHY THE HELL are you 3-betting him? You should never 3-bet this hand if you are not able to play it aggressively postflop, even unimproved (this flop is great for your hand though).

As for the metagame of checking behind here, since this is early in your session and you don't have any history, I would rather do the check back with AA the first time this situation occurs. He is most likely to assume you are scared taking this line, and you won't be able to call a big turnbet profitably.
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 10-01-2007, 03:06 PM
Veron Veron is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Holland
Posts: 590
Default Re: Slightly lost with oesd in 3-bet pot

[ QUOTE ]
If he is that tight preflop, WHY THE HELL are you 3-betting him?

[/ QUOTE ]

there's a difference between opening tight and calling a 3bet OOP tight...
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 10-01-2007, 03:09 PM
MatthewRyan MatthewRyan is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 3,831
Default Re: Slightly lost with oesd in 3-bet pot

[ QUOTE ]
If he is that tight preflop, WHY THE HELL are you 3-betting him? You should never 3-bet this hand if you are not able to play it aggressively postflop, even unimproved (this flop is great for your hand though).

As for the metagame of checking behind here, since this is early in your session and you don't have any history, I would rather do the check back with AA the first time this situation occurs. He is most likely to assume you are scared taking this line, and you won't be able to call a big turnbet profitably.

[/ QUOTE ]
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 10-01-2007, 03:18 PM
HustlerLA HustlerLA is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 307
Default Re: Slightly lost with oesd in 3-bet pot

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
What are you doing 3betting this hand if you don't even know what to do on the simplest flop?

[/ QUOTE ]

tell me how is it the simplest flop? I don't want to just hear 'bet', i want to hear how you react to a shove which is pretty likely given his tight range

[/ QUOTE ]

you dont know what to do because you flopped a decent draw against a tight player in a RR'd pot. Did you only 3bet hoping to take it down preflop? Why did you 3bet a nit with 56s? I really would like to hear your answer. I dont mean this to be retorical, actually want to hear your reasoning.
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 10-01-2007, 03:23 PM
wtf5 wtf5 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 303
Default Re: Slightly lost with oesd in 3-bet pot

[ QUOTE ]
If he is that tight preflop, WHY THE HELL are you 3-betting him? You should never 3-bet this hand if you are not able to play it aggressively postflop, even unimproved (this flop is great for your hand though).

As for the metagame of checking behind here, since this is early in your session and you don't have any history, I would rather do the check back with AA the first time this situation occurs. He is most likely to assume you are scared taking this line, and you won't be able to call a big turnbet profitably.

[/ QUOTE ]

ehm hes 19/17, hes opening quite a few hands from CO, 3betting here is fine. Its also good for shania.

People saying this is a bet/call are prob correct but its close because he probably has a big pair here quite often esp since its one of the first 3bets in the session.
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 10-01-2007, 03:30 PM
Borned_Luckbox1 Borned_Luckbox1 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 510
Default Re: Slightly lost with oesd in 3-bet pot

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
If he is that tight preflop, WHY THE HELL are you 3-betting him? You should never 3-bet this hand if you are not able to play it aggressively postflop, even unimproved (this flop is great for your hand though).

As for the metagame of checking behind here, since this is early in your session and you don't have any history, I would rather do the check back with AA the first time this situation occurs. He is most likely to assume you are scared taking this line, and you won't be able to call a big turnbet profitably.

[/ QUOTE ]

ehm hes 19/17, hes opening quite a few hands from CO, 3betting here is fine. Its also good for shania.

People saying this is a bet/call are prob correct but its close because he probably has a big pair here quite often esp since its one of the first 3bets in the session.

[/ QUOTE ]

We are talking about like 1-2% so it's close [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]

But then we get a nice bluffy image so easy bet/call
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:41 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.