Macro Evolution Epihpanypy.

[vhawk01]

I think we evolved from rocks.

[Nielsio]

I'm pretty sure rocks is a common ancestor we share with bananas.

[Nielsio]

vhawk,

I'm sorry we couldn't continue our discussion in politics. I'm exiled from there.

If you want some food for thought about what we talked about (and this stuff is pretty out there compared to most people), check this:
http://www.graveyardofthegods.com/fo...=19&t=7200

[vhawk01]

[ QUOTE ]
I'm pretty sure rocks is a common ancestor we share with bananas.

[/ QUOTE ]

I agree. I'm not sure if you are being facetious, I'm not.

[Nielsio]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
I'm pretty sure rocks is a common ancestor we share with bananas.

[/ QUOTE ]

I agree. I'm not sure if you are being facetious, I'm not.

[/ QUOTE ]


I realized that some would view my post as a joke/level, but really, it's really not! (and this is also not a double level)

[CORed]

The whole macro-evolution vs. micro-evolution thing is a red herring. "Macro-evolution" is nothing more or less than the accumulation of "micro-evolution" over a very long period of time.

I have yet to see any creationist site prove anything except their complete lack of understanding of how evolution actually works.

[vhawk01]

[ QUOTE ]
The whole macro-evolution vs. micro-evolution thing is a red herring. "Macro-evolution" is nothing more or less than the accumulation of "micro-evolution" over a very long period of time.

I have yet to see any creationist site prove anything except their complete lack of understanding of how evolution actually works.

[/ QUOTE ]

Yeah, to be honest, the evolution that most creationists are arguing against really IS ridiculous and unlikely and hard to believe in. They come to the right conclusion, at least.

[NotReady]

[ QUOTE ]

There's Lucy the Australopithecus afarensis and plenty of Cro-Magnons and Neanderthals.


[/ QUOTE ]

The Aus.'s are no mostly longer considered in man's family tree. Cro-Magnon IS man. Neanderthal was not an ancestor of man.

See if you can find anything on the next latest direct ancestor of man. Or the next before that.

[NotReady]

[ QUOTE ]

I have yet to see any creationist site prove anything except their complete lack of understanding of how evolution actually works.


[/ QUOTE ]

You haven't looked at reasons.org.

[NotReady]

[ QUOTE ]

certainly..but whether it happens (or had happened or can happen) is NOT one of the issues.


[/ QUOTE ]

This is true. Evidence doesn't matter on this issue.