Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > Other Topics > Politics
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 08-17-2007, 11:23 AM
wacki wacki is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: reading 1K climate journals
Posts: 10,708
Default Re: The Global Warming Sheep

[ QUOTE ]
Forcing them to change their fraudulent data made 1934 the hottest year rather than 1998.

[/ QUOTE ]


Can you please tell me exactly what was wrong with the data? Also, on a global scale which is hotter 1998 or 1934? The answers to both are freely available on the web.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 08-17-2007, 11:28 AM
Felix_Nietzsche Felix_Nietzsche is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: The Lone Star State
Posts: 3,593
Default Dr Felix, PhD...School Is In Session

[ QUOTE ]
debunked this last time and you didn't respond. Here it is again. Stop listening to your kook movies that are feeding you lies. The sun is NOT the cause of recent global warming.

[/ QUOTE ]

You have proved NOTHING....
Perhaps you have never taken a science or statistics class. Don't worry, I will educate you. To make an educated guess on cause-and-effect you must have sufficient data. Your miniscule 30 years of solar data is WORTHLESS. What you need is solar data of a MINIMUM of 1000 years. If we had solar data going back to 1050 AD during when Greenland use to be green....this would be useful. If we had solar data going back 20,000 years ago to the Ice age when parts of the USA/EUROPE were buried under 1-mile of ice....this would be useful. You are parroting other people's words without undertstanding the meaning.

NO ONE has the even 1% of the data necessary to speak on the sun's role in global temperature variations. Sorry friend....it is you who is listening to kooks and spreading their lies... Now that I have educated you, you can stop making these silly claims that the sun has no involvement in any recent global warming.... The bottom line is no one knows..... More research is needed....
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 08-17-2007, 11:30 AM
Felix_Nietzsche Felix_Nietzsche is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: The Lone Star State
Posts: 3,593
Default Re: The Global Warming Sheep

[ QUOTE ]
Can you please tell me exactly what was wrong with the data? Also, on a global scale which is hotter 1998 or 1934? The answers to both are freely available on the web.

[/ QUOTE ]
I would be happy too. [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]
You can find the answer here:
www.google.com
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 08-17-2007, 11:38 AM
wacki wacki is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: reading 1K climate journals
Posts: 10,708
Default Re: The Global Warming Sheep

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Can you please tell me exactly what was wrong with the data? Also, on a global scale which is hotter 1998 or 1934? The answers to both are freely available on the web.

[/ QUOTE ]
I would be happy too. [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]
You can find the answer here:
www.google.com

[/ QUOTE ]

I know the answer. I'm simply trying to see if you know the answers. Again, the answers are freely available on the web. Or more importantly, if you are willing to admit the answer.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 08-17-2007, 11:52 AM
renodoc renodoc is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Politics baller.
Posts: 2,142
Default Re: Freeman Dyson, Global Warming Heretic

[ QUOTE ]
The sun is NOT the cause of recent global warming.


[/ QUOTE ]


Uh, is it the moon then?
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 08-17-2007, 11:58 AM
Phil153 Phil153 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 4,905
Default Re: Dr Felix, PhD...School Is In Session

[ QUOTE ]
You have proved NOTHING....

[/ QUOTE ]
We can measure levels of solar fluctuation very accurately. Apart from the fact that these fluctuations are fairly small over the short term, they also show that there is no support for the theory that the sun is causing the warming. In fact, it's pretty obvious it's not.

[ QUOTE ]
Perhaps you have never taken a science or statistics class.

[/ QUOTE ]
I have a degree in physics/math and have taken two semesters of meteorology, with time spent in a meteorology station. I don't claim to be an expert, but I understand the principles and arguments well enough.

[ QUOTE ]
Don't worry, I will educate you. To make an educated guess on cause-and-effect you must have sufficient data. Your minuscule 30 years of solar data is WORTHLESS.

[/ QUOTE ]
If the level of insolation and sunspot frequency has been steady or declining, then the hypothesis that the sun is causing the recent warming seems very silly on the face of it, especially when past fluctutations have caused no such effect. Wouldn't you agree? How precisely do you propose that the sun is causing this warming? Putting out magic warm-beams that we can't detect?
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 08-17-2007, 12:00 PM
Phil153 Phil153 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 4,905
Default Re: Freeman Dyson, Global Warming Heretic

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
The sun is NOT the cause of recent global warming.


[/ QUOTE ]


Uh, is it the moon then?

[/ QUOTE ]

Warming: The process of becoming warmer, a rising temperature

The sun is not the CAUSE of the RISING temperature. Thanks for the nit though, it's amusing.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 08-17-2007, 01:00 PM
Felix_Nietzsche Felix_Nietzsche is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: The Lone Star State
Posts: 3,593
Default Re: Dr Felix, PhD...School Is In Session

[ QUOTE ]
We can measure levels of solar fluctuation very accurately. Apart from the fact that these fluctuations are fairly small over the short term, they also show that there is no support for the theory that the sun is causing the warming. In fact, it's pretty obvious it's not.

[/ QUOTE ]
Obvious? Perhaps you should publish this knowledge. You would win the Nobel prize in science. EASILY! There are numerous varibles which affect the global climate. All these variables must be understood before we can truly know the impact of solar variations. Solar output is just one factor. Hell, a single volcano explosion can cause HUGE changes in the weather with CONSTANT solar output.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Year_Without_a_Summer
Your claim that it is OBVIOUS the sun does not cause recent warmings shows you lack understanding. You do *NOT* have the data to make such claims....... The difference between you and I is when I don't know something...I say so. You are on the other hand pretend that you do know.

[ QUOTE ]
I don't claim to be an expert

[/ QUOTE ]
We are in agreement here... But again, climate is such a complicated subject I don't think their is *ONE* expert on this planet. All we can do is take experts subfields and try to fit the puzzle together the best we can. So far the results have been quite disappointing... I would argue that we humans have regressed in our knowledge of global climate...


[ QUOTE ]
but I understand the principles and arguments well enough.

[/ QUOTE ]
I don't think so. If you have taken a freshman statistics course, then you will realize you can NOT make such claims about the relationship of solar variation and warming based on a miniscule 30 years of data.... But you are in good company. An army of PhD climatologists make similar claims...

[ QUOTE ]
If the level of insolation and sunspot frequency has been steady or declining, then the hypothesis that the sun is causing the recent warming seems very silly on the face of it, especially when past fluctutations have caused no such effect. Wouldn't you agree?

[/ QUOTE ]
No....I don't agree.
I am educated enough not to make such claims on such a tiny amount of data.... However, 99% of climatologists have no qualms about about abandoning basic scientific principles in order to get their research grants. They are like Pavlovian rats pressing buttons to get their food pellets...

[ QUOTE ]
How precisely do you propose that the sun is causing this warming?

[/ QUOTE ]
I do not make such claims. I claim that more data is needed. The fact that the ice caps on Mars are melting has added credibility to the hypothesis that the sun COULD be the primary factor in recent global warming.
http://science.nasa.gov/headlines/y2..._southpole.htm

Perhaps you will next claim that belching bovines and cement factories ended the Ice Age 20,000 years ago. Yes? Perhaps the Vikings invented the automobile in 900 AD causing Greenland to be green and allow the growing of crops? Yes? Perhaps you are like most climatologists and ignore the MOST IMPORTANT greenhouse gas......water vapor. yes?

The arrogance of the MCGW (Man-Causes-Global-Warming) Cult is astonishing. The claims they make without having supporting data is mind-boggling to me. There is little difference between the ancient Greeks that invented Zeus, Hera, Apollo, etc... to explain their world and the modern day climatologist who seeks to explain our world. Human nature has not changed in 20,000 years. We are still a hyper-superstitious species... Our new satan is CO2. Our new high priest is Al Gore. Our original sin is taking a bite from the apple of technology. Sickening....

You are unknowingly a disciple of the dark side....I encourage you to join me in the land of light-and-reason. You won't get nifty govt research grants but you will sleep better at night......

Hmmmmm...well perhaps you won't sleep better. Some of these global warming nitwits have aggravated me to the point where it screws up my sleep.... Never mind, if you want to sleep better than don't listen to me..... [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 08-17-2007, 01:02 PM
Felix_Nietzsche Felix_Nietzsche is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: The Lone Star State
Posts: 3,593
Default Re: The Global Warming Sheep

[ QUOTE ]
I know the answer. I'm simply trying to see if you know the answers.

[/ QUOTE ]
I remmber playing this game as a child....
Two people going in circles wasting a lot of time. Wouldn't it just be easier to state your point? Instead of playing this game?
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 08-17-2007, 01:10 PM
L'ennemi. L'ennemi. is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 194
Default Re: Dr Felix, PhD...School Is In Session

[ QUOTE ]
However, 99% of climatologists have no qualms about about abandoning basic scientific principles in order to get their research grants. They are like Pavlovian rats pressing buttons to get their food pellets

[/ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Stephen McIntyre is a former mining executive

[/ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
McIntyre was the President and founder of Northwest Exploration Company Limited and a director of its parent company, Northwest Explorations Inc. When Northwest Explorations Inc. was taken over in 1998 by CGX Resources Inc. to form the oil and gas exploration company CGX Energy Inc., McIntyre ceased being a director. McIntyre was a strategic advisor for CGX in 2000 through 2003

[/ QUOTE ]
LOL!!!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:32 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.