Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > Limit Texas Hold'em > Micro Stakes Limit
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old 07-24-2007, 08:30 AM
Xhad Xhad is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: .25/.50 6max - stars
Posts: 5,289
Default Re: Nut Flush Draw and Overcards

[ QUOTE ]
It's three-way after the other guy folds. If we call we get 1 BB max. If we raise, we're almost certainly getting 1 BB from BB

[/ QUOTE ]

Assuming our hand is good (I agree that there's no specific reason to put BB on a better hand but we're not even close to the nuts here)

[ QUOTE ]
with the added potential of getting 2 more from a Button coldcall.

[/ QUOTE ]

I doubt button has more than a pair of 8s and even fish can probably fold that for 2 bets.
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 07-24-2007, 08:53 AM
Sushiglutton Sushiglutton is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Searching for fish
Posts: 2,048
Default Re: Nut Flush Draw and Overcards

I 3-bet pf. I would raise the flop. I just call river.
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 07-24-2007, 09:10 AM
Oink Oink is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: SLAAAYYYERRRR ! ! ! !
Posts: 4,226
Default Re: Nut Flush Draw and Overcards

I just want to add that you shouldnt take the free card if you get the pot HU.

The pot will be around 5-6 BB's so with 15 cards to improve you only need a fold around 10-12% of the time to make a bet +EV.
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 07-24-2007, 09:18 AM
sharpie sharpie is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: 35/25.2
Posts: 7,314
Default Re: Nut Flush Draw and Overcards

I also think JT is possible on the river, and alot of people at .25/.5 won't valuebet mid pair on the river into 3 opponents.
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 07-24-2007, 12:33 PM
Harv72b Harv72b is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Baltimore, MD
Posts: 6,830
Default Re: Nut Flush Draw and Overcards

[ QUOTE ]
You think it's most probable that BB turned two pair? He's in a perfect to c/r, and that 9 is not a scare card at all. I'd expect this to just be 8x or 9x a whole lot. The read I want on the river is not on BB. I think we beat him a whole lot. The read I want is on button. I think if button is tight, we have an easy raise. If button is loose, a call looks much better to get the likely overcall.

[/ QUOTE ]

I don't have a whole lot of recent micro experience, but in those relatively few hands I've seen this line a lot from a hand like 98 or 92 or whatever--they just see that they turned two pair & can't wait to bet it. I think 9x is also fairly likely, but what can the X be after he peels the flop? Maybe A9, maybe he's loose & bad & just likes to peel.

As far as the button goes, in a scenario like this where it's effectively 3-handed when the action's to me on the river and that river card wasn't a big-time scare card (i.e., flush card or 4-straight on board), I don't really worry too much about the player behind me. He's either calling 1 bet or he's not, and if he is calling 1 then he might call 2 as well. I'm primarily focused on the bettor, his range, how I stack up against it, and how likely he is to pay me off with a worse hand if I raise. If he's going to call the raise with many worse hands, then obviously I want to raise; it gets me the same number of bets (at least) as if I got the overcall. If my range doesn't stack up very well against his, then I'd rather go for the overcall & not open myself up to being 3bet or called by a better hand/have a worse hand fold. If I have no idea about his play (as here), I generally default to the "safer" option, which is flat calling & going for the overcall.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:31 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.