ZeeJustin the next to get caught multi accounting Party MTTs

[CardSharpCook]

why not lock it now?

[HiatusOver]

I agree, lets lock this already...I am sick of checking back in with it and seeing a bunch of people bumping the thread to break some geeky 2+2 post count record. GG ZeeJustin thread

[Hiltonian]

[ QUOTE ]
I agree, lets lock this already...I am sick of checking back in with it and seeing a bunch of people bumping the thread to break some geeky 2+2 post count record. GG ZeeJustin thread

[/ QUOTE ]
But its soooo close!!
Seriously though, has anyone heard anything from ZJ since his statement? His website hasn't been updated in a while, and he obviously hasn't had any new posts since then.

[benkahuna]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Here's my recommendation (and I think we all trust Lloyd):

If, in the future, anyone in the MTT forum becomes aware of widespread cheating occuring, they PM Lloyd so he can make an "official" announcement or something -- Lloyd can post something like "Attention: this kind of cheating seems to be occuring. Everyone should be aware". Lloyd agrees to not reveal whoever PMed him.

I understand how complicated these situations can be among friends, etc. Maybe this way too alarmist, going over-board, whatever. But it sounds like genuinely good and honest people knew what was occuring and were in impossibly difficult situations. At the very least, it lets everyone in the community be aware of the cheating issues that exist in the games. I realize it does nothing for the masses who aren't 2+2 members, but I think this is at least an improvement. Hopefully people don't abuse it and PM Lloyd everytime they get sucked out and think they're being colluded against.

Alright, flame away. I admit this is probably stupid. And my advanced apologies to Lloyd if he hates this idea.

[/ QUOTE ]

I'm a big fan of this.

[/ QUOTE ]
I'm not [img]/images/graemlins/frown.gif[/img]

[/ QUOTE ]

I like the idea. It Lloyd doesn't want to do it, I'd love it if someone did.

We can have our own online Truth and Reconciliation group.

I'd be happy to take any information people have and make an MTT post with whatever information anyone wanted to give me about cheating in bigger online tournaments.

Make a gimmick account and give me or someone else some info, even that there's at least one person you know is cheating.

Anyone that knowingly aids cheaters is part of the problem and is tacitly condoning their behavior. If your friends are doing it, make them stop or there will be consequences. If they are jerks about it, you really need to ask yourself if you want to be their friend.

This segment in Seinfeld actually made me consider the ethics of ratting on friends:

George: You are a good friend. You know what? Even if you killed somebody I wouldn't turn you in.

Jerry: Is that so?

Jerry: Hey, Kramer if I killed somebody would you turn me in?

Kramer: Definitely.

Jerry: You're kidding?

Kramer: No, no, I would turn you in.

Jerry: You would turn me in?

Kramer: Phwap, I wouldn't even think about it.

Jerry: I can't believe your a friend of mine.

Kramer: What kind of person are you going around killing people?

Jerry: Well, I am sure I had a good reason.

Kramer: Well,, if you'll kill this person, who's to say I wouldn't be next?

Jerry: But you know me!

Kramer: I thought I DID!

[Eric Stoner]

[ QUOTE ]
I think curtains said he is up to 6?

[/ QUOTE ]

He and Clarkmeister are winning...they should share names - I must have missed some.

[BassMasterK]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Aside from the fact that the Model Rules do not govern in my jurisdiction, and are thus irrelevant, your analysis is so poor and libelous that I will actually respond to it at length later this afternoon (I dearly wish I could now) to show what an idiot you are.

I will make you my bitch. I don't know where you went to school, but I'm pretty sure the diploma came in the mail.

[/ QUOTE ]

The last we heard from you, you were going to make jman "your bitch" as soon as you had the time yesterday afternoon. Over 24 hours later and not a peep from you. How disappointing.

[img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img]

[/ QUOTE ]

agreed!

[Manque]

when Gigabet wrote that Party was still with the skins and it was common practice to have accounts with Party and the skins so you could play more than 4 tables.

[junglewarfare]

So has Stars changed its crazy decision to only take the money from ZJ which he won in tourneys they can prove he multi accounted in? Doesn't make sense that this thread has degenerated into namecalling and a stupid argument about snitching when people should be calling Stars on their BS.

[ALReturnsLOL]

[ QUOTE ]
So has Stars changed its crazy decision to only take the money from ZJ which he won in tourneys they can prove he multi accounted in? Doesn't make sense that this thread has degenerated into namecalling and a stupid argument about snitching when people should be calling Stars on their BS.

[/ QUOTE ]


Sorry, but I have missed a large portion of this thread. ZJ
had multi accounts at stars also? and they did not take all his money or ban him? what gives?

[bobbyi]

[ QUOTE ]
when Gigabet wrote that Party was still with the skins and it was common practice to have accounts with Party and the skins so you could play more than 4 tables.

[/ QUOTE ]
Yeah. Even tons of people who didn't multitable had accounts on multiple skins to get the signup and reload bonuses at each one. Also, a lot of people would move to one of the skins to another for better rakeback. It was completely accepted. In the zoo, there would be a huge thread for the Empire reload with tons of people doing it and then two weeks later all the same people in the thread for the Party reload.