![]() |
|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: Would you rather be broke as a joke or a filthy rich overweight AxisOfEvilian? | |||
| Broke as a Joke |
|
13 | 24.53% |
| Filthy rich overweight AxisOfEvilian |
|
40 | 75.47% |
| Voters: 53. You may not vote on this poll | |||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#3091
|
|||
|
|||
|
I take stuff too personally very often...... everytime I try and post stuff here that is helpful, because in reality I would like to see the people who are really working on their game (2+2'ers) improve and succeed, I didnt post for nearly 2 years b/c I don't like ego contests much, i've learned most of the things I know from this place and some friends i've been lucky enough to have, the whole point of what I was trying to say is mixing your game up and changing styles is very important, the only style i've ever played that wins at all levels is 19/16, i think its as close to optimal as it gets really, but even as low as 50nl there is a lot more metagame then people really consider and I feel i can beat any table at nl50, most of my tables have a few regs, and I like it that way, you are not going to become a better pokerplayer spending all your time trying to isolate donkeys, in the shortterm you will make more $ but its not going to improve your game any, i made some generalizations, but I think their are some huge concepts in their that in my personal opinion are key to beating nl50, over the long term, if your willing to put in 100k's of hands. I'm taking my sweet ass time moving up this time, I want to do it right, and im trying to become a student of the game and a teacher of what I have learned too, there will always be donkeys in microstakes that are the sole reason that everyone has money to make higher up.
|
|
#3092
|
|||
|
|||
|
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] I have a feeling ssdex isn't a worse player than his critics. 50NL isn't rocketscience .. you actually don't have to tableselect if you are not clueless. [/ QUOTE ] but it will add nice profit if u do. [/ QUOTE ] Four tabling ... perhaps ... with 8-9 resized tables on your screen and players coming in and out of the games all the time anyway, I don't find it worth the hassle. [/ QUOTE ] Takes 5 seconds to sit at a table filled with tards wanting to give their money away, rather than sitting at tables with wannabes resisting to give their money away. Gosh, I wish I had those 5 seconds back.... EDIT: 4 tabling?!?! lmao... since when does table selection have a 4-table limit? |
|
#3093
|
|||
|
|||
|
[ QUOTE ]
I take stuff too personally very often...... everytime I try and post stuff here that is helpful, because in reality I would like to see the people who are really working on their game (2+2'ers) improve and succeed, I didnt post for nearly 2 years b/c I don't like ego contests much, i've learned most of the things I know from this place and some friends i've been lucky enough to have, the whole point of what I was trying to say is mixing your game up and changing styles is very important, the only style i've ever played that wins at all levels is 19/16, i think its as close to optimal as it gets really, but even as low as 50nl there is a lot more metagame then people really consider and I feel i can beat any table at nl50, most of my tables have a few regs, and I like it that way, you are not going to become a better pokerplayer spending all your time trying to isolate donkeys, in the shortterm you will make more $ but its not going to improve your game any, i made some generalizations, but I think their are some huge concepts in their that in my personal opinion are key to beating nl50, over the long term, if your willing to put in 100k's of hands. I'm taking my sweet ass time moving up this time, I want to do it right, and im trying to become a student of the game and a teacher of what I have learned too, there will always be donkeys in microstakes that are the sole reason that everyone has money to make higher up. [/ QUOTE ] I cant get past the second line. Would love to know what ur saying, but u gotta use alinea's and punctuation. |
|
#3094
|
|||
|
|||
|
[ QUOTE ]
Anyone play on Absolute Poker? I've never played there but I'm looking to bonus whore that $500 sign-up... How long do you think it'd take to clear 8-9 tabling 25 NL? Do they release the bonus all at once, or in $20 increments like FT? [/ QUOTE ] Same question only 4-tabling and clearing the $600 deposit bonus at FTP? How long? |
|
#3095
|
|||
|
|||
|
[ QUOTE ]
I have a feeling ssdex isn't a worse player than his critics. 50NL isn't rocketscience .. you actually don't have to tableselect if you are not clueless. [/ QUOTE ] Gelford, i hope you're not suggesting that calling a 3-bet against an ubertight 3-bettor with KQ is +ev |
|
#3096
|
|||
|
|||
|
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Anyone play on Absolute Poker? I've never played there but I'm looking to bonus whore that $500 sign-up... How long do you think it'd take to clear 8-9 tabling 25 NL? Do they release the bonus all at once, or in $20 increments like FT? [/ QUOTE ] Same question only 4-tabling and clearing the $600 deposit bonus at FTP? How long? [/ QUOTE ] At 25 it's going to take around 40-50k hands at least. |
|
#3097
|
|||
|
|||
|
[ QUOTE ]
I take stuff too personally very often...... everytime I try and post stuff here that is helpful, because in reality I would like to see the people who are really working on their game (2+2'ers) improve and succeed, I didnt post for nearly 2 years b/c I don't like ego contests much, i've learned most of the things I know from this place and some friends i've been lucky enough to have, the whole point of what I was trying to say is mixing your game up and changing styles is very important, the only style i've ever played that wins at all levels is 19/16, i think its as close to optimal as it gets really, but even as low as 50nl there is a lot more metagame then people really consider and I feel i can beat any table at nl50, most of my tables have a few regs, and I like it that way, you are not going to become a better pokerplayer spending all your time trying to isolate donkeys, in the shortterm you will make more $ but its not going to improve your game any, i made some generalizations, but I think their are some huge concepts in their that in my personal opinion are key to beating nl50, over the long term, if your willing to put in 100k's of hands. I'm taking my sweet ass time moving up this time, I want to do it right, and im trying to become a student of the game and a teacher of what I have learned too, there will always be donkeys in microstakes that are the sole reason that everyone has money to make higher up. [/ QUOTE ] Impressive graph, and I'm sure you're a good player, but please please use paragraphs! |
|
#3098
|
|||
|
|||
|
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] I have a feeling ssdex isn't a worse player than his critics. 50NL isn't rocketscience .. you actually don't have to tableselect if you are not clueless. [/ QUOTE ] Gelford, i hope you're not suggesting that calling a 3-bet against an ubertight 3-bettor with KQ is +ev [/ QUOTE ] No I prefer 54s [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img] |
|
#3099
|
|||
|
|||
|
The 2-3 hand I can live with against specific opponents but as a standard play it is pretty bad and the tighter the blinds the better in this spot
|
|
#3100
|
|||
|
|||
|
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] I have a feeling ssdex isn't a worse player than his critics. 50NL isn't rocketscience .. you actually don't have to tableselect if you are not clueless. [/ QUOTE ] but it will add nice profit if u do. [/ QUOTE ] Four tabling ... perhaps ... with 8-9 resized tables on your screen and players coming in and out of the games all the time anyway, I don't find it worth the hassle. [/ QUOTE ] Takes 5 seconds to sit at a table filled with tards wanting to give their money away, rather than sitting at tables with wannabes resisting to give their money away. Gosh, I wish I had those 5 seconds back.... EDIT: 4 tabling?!?! lmao... since when does table selection have a 4-table limit? [/ QUOTE ] Yeah, I 9-12 table and still table select. It's ez |
![]() |
|
|