UTG standards...with warm legs...

[pegboy]

It's hot out so the kid and I are headin' out to buy me some short pants. How's about a few opinions while we spend...

You're UTG and the 3 players to your left are tightish. The blinds are loosish. Do you come in raising with..

1. AJ ?
2. KQs ?
3. 66 ?
4. A9s ?
5. AT ?
6. KJs ?
7. A8s ?
8. KTs ?
9. KQ ?
10. A7s ?
11. A9 ?
12. KJ ?
13. 55 ?
14. QJs ?
15. K9s ?

By the way this is not a random list. It is specifically ordered according to...

[aargh57]

Unless the guys to my right are very loose (and I mean looser than 45VPIP) I switch tables. But if they are nice and loose I raise all of these except K9s.

[secretprankster]

Probably raise all, K9s and 55 could easily be tossed though.

[kaby]

If they're really tight (like 20/13) I raise everything here. If they adjusted/play a bit more hands pbb raise all but 55(66), A9, A7s and K9s

[Oink]

Folding any of these hands in any game that doesnt have a sick rake structure is pissing away money.

[yourface]

I wouldn't raise 55 A9 A7s or K9s

6 handed is for nits though

[secretprankster]

[ QUOTE ]
Folding any of these hands in any game that doesnt have a sick rake structure is pissing away money.

[/ QUOTE ]

No it's not.

[sharpie]

All of these are defaults for me except A9, 55, and K9s. I would probably open 55 and K9s if the blinds are loose passive.

[Oink]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Folding any of these hands in any game that doesnt have a sick rake structure is pissing away money.

[/ QUOTE ]

No it's not.

[/ QUOTE ]

Yes it is and its not up for debate. If you cant extract value from those hands UTG you either suck at poker, pay too much rake or have bad seat/table selection.

[Apanage]

Exclude A9o and I´m in your camp Oink.