![]() |
|
#41
|
|||
|
|||
|
100nl on stars
I'm on UK time, but am available at any time |
|
#42
|
|||
|
|||
|
NL100 on Unibet, available anytime
|
|
#43
|
|||
|
|||
|
100NL on stars... available any time Pretty much.
|
|
#44
|
|||
|
|||
|
[ QUOTE ]
I don't really understand the OP... What's with having 'groups'? Sorry, I'm stupid. [/ QUOTE ]I thought it would lead to better and more personalized discussion about hands, plus if we had a smaller group rather than all of us just posting a video we would be more apt to take the "free coaching" (which is what it boils down to) seriously. |
|
#45
|
|||
|
|||
|
<u>In so far:</u>
Casper05 willw9 ThePuma holyfield5 cbloom _dave_ reup Wu36 luckybacon Clashes josh_x skillzilla rberg pdoran10 $upermad4it mertzo DND Jamie217 zaephyr TehVader SwimStrong kekec37 Kowalski vabogee SilentNoise MortenTA downbytheriver ComputerMaster tozzy RRiccio VPIP100 sc00t Michaelson creative phantom_lord brandysbich LuckyKid DrRock |
|
#46
|
|||
|
|||
|
groups of 5 FTW?
|
|
#47
|
|||
|
|||
|
What do you guys think? You don't think 5 would be too much? I was thinking 4, but everything is open for discussion as far as the best format.
I'm also not sure how to handle the posters with only like 30 posts or whatever- I don't want to shut them out and be a dick, but they haven't contributed to the forum either...maybe tell them they are more than welcome to join our next group or say screw it and include them? Thoughts? We have 38 now, and I figure we'll get at least a few more in the next couple days. |
|
#48
|
|||
|
|||
|
Groups of 6 would be sick. Get all 6 to play at the same table and make an hour long video of the same session. Then after compare notes and videos and analyze why you made what plays etc...
|
|
#49
|
|||
|
|||
|
I'll join if you need anybody.
|
|
#50
|
|||
|
|||
|
meh i'd maybe weed out some of the really questionable people who haven't participated much, but w/e. group of anywhere between 3 and 8 are cool with me.
|
![]() |
|
|