Help Settle Dispute: PLEASE RATE THIS GIRL OOT!

[AceCR9]

I gave her a 2, but by OOT standards she's a -4 I think

[pirateboy]

I think in these threads, when a guy votes, he should supply a picture of himself. Thus, we can find out how accurate the vote is.

If it's this guy:


Then we can understand a 4 or a 5

[KotOD]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Agreed, Davenport is a prototypical 5. She's not attractive, she's not ugly, she's not fat, she's not got a jolie body. She's the average woman.

[/ QUOTE ]

Not a nice body? She's a professional athelete. She's more fit than probably anyone posting on this thread.

[/ QUOTE ]

Have you seen her lately?

[Klompy]

[ QUOTE ]
I think in these threads, when a guy votes, he should supply a picture of himself. Thus, we can find out how accurate the vote is.

If it's this guy:


Then we can understand a 4 or a 5

[/ QUOTE ]

Pirateboy, you be first to post pics of yourself.

[Alobar]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
shes a solid 4 IMO. If she lost some weight she could easily be a 5

The more interesting question is, is this OPs GF, or is OP the girl?

[/ QUOTE ]

Outline what aspects make her a 4. She's butt [censored] ugly

[/ QUOTE ]

Shes not butt ugly. I can find a TON of uglier chicks than this girl in 30 seconds, hell just look at the other girls in those pics. If this girl is a 2 or 1 (as you are implying), wtf are all the super fat nasty girls then?

This girl is a 4 because her titties aint bad. She isnt incredibly fat, just the typical overweight college chick who could stand to lose 20 pounds. Her face isnt hideously deformed, she doesnt have any striking giant physical flaw, its just her arrangement of features isnt very attractive. So in short, shes basically your average looking girl just chubby. So a 4.

Really if you make 5 exactly average as how peole in america actually look (as opposed to how we should look), then shes a 5 because shes pretty much your average chubby bland girl. God bless fast food.

[TxRedMan]

I voted 2. I dont think you can vote for a 1, b/c there are obv. less attractive girls out there. However, she's not a 5 either, b/c 5 is average.

And WTF at the vote-tards who gave 10's.

[pirateboy]

I can understand anywhere from a 2 to a 3.4 for that girl.

And I'm a solid 5, soooooooooooooo.

[pirateboy]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
shes a solid 4 IMO. If she lost some weight she could easily be a 5

The more interesting question is, is this OPs GF, or is OP the girl?

[/ QUOTE ]

Outline what aspects make her a 4. She's butt [censored] ugly

[/ QUOTE ]

Shes not butt ugly. I can find a TON of uglier chicks than this girl in 30 seconds, hell just look at the other girls in those pics. If this girl is a 2 or 1 (as you are implying), wtf are all the super fat nasty girls then?

This girl is a 4 because her titties aint bad. She isnt incredibly fat, just the typical overweight college chick who could stand to lose 20 pounds. Her face isnt hideously deformed, she doesnt have any striking giant physical flaw, its just her arrangement of features isnt very attractive. So in short, shes basically your average looking girl just chubby. So a 4.

Really if you make 5 exactly average as how peole in america actually look (as opposed to how we should look), then shes a 5 because shes pretty much your average chubby bland girl. God bless fast food.

[/ QUOTE ]

Good post. She's a 3 or 2 in my mind, with a lot of movement in that range. She has the nasty sideburns that most chubby girls have. Yuck.

[econophile]

[ QUOTE ]



I can understand anywhere from a 2 to a 3.4 for that girl.

And I'm a solid 5, soooooooooooooo.

[/ QUOTE ]

[pirateboy]

Yup, let dudes vote on another dude.