![]() |
|
#91
|
|||
|
|||
|
[ QUOTE ]
What about POG? [/ QUOTE ] These are archives up till 2005. Forums that didn't exist then will not be in it. |
|
#92
|
|||
|
|||
|
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] What about POG? [/ QUOTE ] These are archives up till 2005. Forums that didn't exist then will not be in it. [/ QUOTE ] Huh. Thought I saw some new ones in there. OK, as long as my geek forum is still alive. |
|
#93
|
|||
|
|||
|
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] To save space we would have to drop both the online/offline indicator and the mood indicator. . [/ QUOTE ] I'd vote to drop them to save space fwiw. They are kinda cute perks, but they wouldn't really be missed. [/ QUOTE ] [/ QUOTE ] I've temporarily removed the mood and offline/online indicator. We may put them back, but I want people to see what it would be like without them. Is the space savings significant enough to matter? [/ QUOTE ] Much much better, IMO. KJS |
|
#94
|
|||
|
|||
|
[ QUOTE ]
I've temporarily removed the mood and offline/online indicator. We may put them back, but I want people to see what it would be like without them. Is the space savings significant enough to matter? [/ QUOTE ] I think this is a significant improvement, FWIW |
|
#95
|
|||
|
|||
|
Holy god people, have you looked at the "watched forums" feature? BEST THING EVER.
|
|
#96
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Posts are still way too tall. That could get really really annoying. |
|
#97
|
|||
|
|||
|
One difference is the post title goes all the way across in the new design. Not sure if it would be just a matter of re-doing html in a template.
Second is the space between each post, none in current style, I think 5px in new style ( t_outer in CSS ). |
|
#98
|
|||
|
|||
|
[ QUOTE ]
Holy god people, have you looked at the "watched forums" feature? BEST THING EVER. [/ QUOTE ] Is there a feature that is different than the watched thread feature current avaiable where any new post is emailed to you. |
|
#99
|
|||
|
|||
|
[ QUOTE ]
Chuck, Ryan... Signatures will be disabled, right? [/ QUOTE ] Yeah, unless you want us to turn them back on. |
|
#100
|
|||
|
|||
|
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Chuck, Ryan... Signatures will be disabled, right? [/ QUOTE ] Yeah, unless you want us to turn them back on. [/ QUOTE ] Wouldn't the current location restrictions essentially nullify the purpose of signatures? |
![]() |
|
|