|
|
#1
01-12-2007, 09:07 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Rakeback vs rake paid on the site... What is better???
Ok guys, I asked for a rakeback on FTP but could'nt since I was one of the first player who registered with them and they don't want to convert my account....
I'm playing HU cash game 0.5-1$NL or 1-2$NL on Betson and on FTP ... I have a rake back on Betson of 35% and for FTP, I have a bonus that is equivalent of a 6% rakeback but this bonus is not always running.... Here is my question: On Betson, the max rake you can pay on any given hand is 1$ and on FTP it's only 0.50$. Do you think it approximately comes to the same for the rake I pay? Or put it another way: if i'm playing the same hands on each site, wich one let more money in my pocket??? Don't forget it's HU.... tx for the answers and for those who will say i should put it on another place on the forum cause it's about rake back, I ask to you since you play HU and not them.... [img]/images/graemlins/laugh.gif[/img] 
|
|
#3
01-13-2007, 03:18 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Rakeback vs rake paid on the site... What is better???
The difference between $1 and $0.50 rake caps is huge. Assuming opposition is similar, you'll do far better at the site with a $0.50 cap even with no rakeback, if you're hitting the cap consistently.
The only question is how often you are hitting the cap at such low levels. Especially at .5/1 NL you may be better off at Betsson simply because you'll have a lot of raked pots that don't even get to $10. I'd give serious consideration to UB at those stakes as well. They have a $0.50 cap and their bonus is 20% rb equivalent, plus whatever points for cash would be worth to you.
|
|
#5
01-15-2007, 01:05 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Rakeback vs rake paid on the site... What is better???
[ QUOTE ]
but do they have hu 0.5-1 NL cash game at UB??? cause last tiume I went there there were none... [/ QUOTE ] No they don't... I glanced through quickly and mistook the HU PL games for them. Sorry.
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
