Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > General Poker Discussion > News, Views, and Gossip
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 12-24-2006, 11:19 PM
Kathy Kathy is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 91
Default Sklansky Quote=High Rollers

[ QUOTE ]
Most of the super high stakes players will eventually go broke, especially if endorsement opportunities fall off.
The reasons are:

1. They overestimate their win rate. They don't realize how much Andy Beal and a few others contribute to it and they don't realize how tiny or non existent it is when they are playing in games without someone like that.

2. They don't know how to calculate required bankroll for a given set of win rates and standard deviations. For the games they play in they need ten million easy.

3. They can't drop down. The idea of playing all day to win $20,000 is almost impossible for them to deal with. And when they are forced to drop down they play too loose against the very tough competitors that they falsely think they can easily outplay. I have personally seen this downward spiral many times.

But there are exceptions and Daniel may be one of them.

[/ QUOTE ]

What is difficult to understand?

David is correct!

KATHY [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 12-24-2006, 11:23 PM
Onaflag Onaflag is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Space for Rent
Posts: 1,340
Default Re: Sklansky Quote=High Rollers

Link, please?

Onaflag........
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 12-24-2006, 11:25 PM
jah7_fsu1 jah7_fsu1 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,598
Default Re: Sklansky Quote=High Rollers

What's your point? If you can do those things you won't go broke...a lot of people can't so they do...which is what he was saying.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 12-24-2006, 11:33 PM
Kathy Kathy is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 91
Default Re: Sklansky Quote=High Rollers

daniel n busto?

KATHY
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 12-24-2006, 11:37 PM
[Phill] [Phill] is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Blogging Again (Again)
Posts: 5,821
Default Re: Sklansky Quote=High Rollers

"especially if endorsement opportunities fall off."

"daniel n busto?"

No.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 12-25-2006, 12:38 AM
Daliman Daliman is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Wongs are two things, (at least).
Posts: 10,376
Default Re: Sklansky Quote=High Rollers

Uh, seems to me that "most of the super high stakes players were super hight before the boom, so this is a pretty shortsighted statement.

Anyways, unless a small few are going to destroy the rest, obviously this statement is almost certainly unpossible. Is the rake going to grind them up?
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 12-25-2006, 01:56 AM
Mhoram Mhoram is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 203
Default Re: Sklansky Quote=High Rollers

David doesn't know what he's talking about. He can't play at that level so he makes up some excuse about how he doesn't play that level because it's mathematically incorrect. What a joke. He has no business commenting on this sort of stuff anyway.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 12-25-2006, 02:02 AM
jah7_fsu1 jah7_fsu1 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,598
Default Re: Sklansky Quote=High Rollers

[ QUOTE ]
daniel n busto?

[/ QUOTE ]

More like suffering a downswing, probably not even close to busto, just underolled at the current time for the ultra high stakes cash games.

I would say the inability to drop down or being underolled is the biggest killer. I know I have a hard time dropping down stakes when I'm on a downswing, and I imagine it'd be even tougher for high stakes players who want to keep up an image or go for the quick score rush.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 12-25-2006, 02:27 AM
shaniac shaniac is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 4,386
Default Re: Sklansky Quote=High Rollers

[ QUOTE ]


Anyways, unless a small few are going to destroy the rest

[/ QUOTE ]

I think this is mostly the case. I'm pretty sure David's point that very few players are rolled for the game is also valid.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 12-25-2006, 02:27 AM
Kathy Kathy is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 91
Default Re: Sklansky Quote=High Rollers

ego?

David mentions that.

KATHY
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:29 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.