![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Lets just take FT and PS as our examples. If there are (45 + 82 respectively = 127) 6-max 25NL tables, making approximately 600 players give or take on the two biggest sites, how many of them are 2p2?
|
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
i play full ring and i think there are less at FR. how can you measure this? maybe a poll?
|
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
At 25 NL I think its on average around 1 per table.
At 50 NL however(FT atleast) I'm seeing a huge grow in regulars/solid players, at least 2 at every table. |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
thats not something good to look forward to
|
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
Where I usually play NL50 and NL100 I really doubt there is a single 2p2'er. When I occasional play 6max NL50/100 at FTP I am suprised by the number of solid aggressive players.
|
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
The correct answer is very, very few. Certainly less than 1 per table. Even most decent players you see at the tables at that level aren't 2+2.
|
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
maybe I said it wrong, I meant in general, "solid" players, with +- 20 vpip and 15 pfr.
|
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
I have been playing a lot of hands in the past week at NL25 on Stars, and I haven't seen a whole lot of people that I would think of to be 2p2. There are just so many players, that it's not an issue to be worried about running into 2p2 players.Not at the micros anyway.
|
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
[ QUOTE ]
maybe I said it wrong, I meant in general, "solid" players, with +- 20 vpip and 15 pfr. [/ QUOTE ] The majority of these types are bad players anyways. |
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
[ QUOTE ]
Where I usually play NL50 and NL100 I really doubt there is a single 2p2'er. When I occasional play 6max NL50/100 at FTP I am suprised by the number of solid aggressive players. [/ QUOTE ] Where do you usually play? |
![]() |
|
|