![]() |
|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: Who is dumber? | |||
| The old lady |
|
4 | 36.36% |
| The crook |
|
2 | 18.18% |
| They are both equally unintelligent |
|
5 | 45.45% |
| this space intentionally left blank |
|
0 | 0% |
| Voters: 11. You may not vote on this poll | |||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#171
|
|||
|
|||
|
Yeah, and my friend has some PickYourRiver code available. Be sure to get the latest release ver. 8.6.
|
|
#172
|
|||
|
|||
|
I'd make an even money wager that these are Party house bots.
|
|
#173
|
|||
|
|||
|
[ QUOTE ]
I'd make an even money wager that these are Party house bots. [/ QUOTE ] how much? |
|
#174
|
|||
|
|||
|
[ QUOTE ]
I'd make an even money wager that these are Party house bots. [/ QUOTE ] Absolutely, positively impossible. Party is a public company, the scandal would be huge, and it's just not worth it for them. |
|
#175
|
|||
|
|||
|
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] I'd make an even money wager that these are Party house bots. [/ QUOTE ] Absolutely, positively impossible. Party is a public company, the scandal would be huge, and it's just not worth it for them. [/ QUOTE ] Kinda like Enron/worldcom/Tyco, etc. etc. etc. Don't underestimate the power of corporate greed especially from a company in party's position (used to be market darling/just took a huge hit/trying to placate investors, etc.) And I am a CPA that works in corporate governance and I cannot stand the "they won't do it because the scandal would be huge and they have too much to lose" argument. |
|
#176
|
|||
|
|||
|
[ QUOTE ]
My most updated list of possible bots on PartyPoker. I've e-mailed it to PartyPoker as well. AddedMoney1 bennydale111 big_colonel bound_away cloudy_bay ducks_nuts fair_dingkum flying_spur frames_depot Gabriel6661 GoldenGus gunsmoked333 HelicoptLeo Liguria111 Mads080205 mes_ami miss_meidy pagliaccio_ prime_move Prometheus42 roball111 RoccoSuper sanddance simon_sez555 stabber555 Starway successor111 tuckerrain tawriffic WonderW_72 vallyvally [/ QUOTE ] HOLY CRAP. im actually listed there!!! rofl |
|
#177
|
|||
|
|||
|
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] My most updated list of possible bots on PartyPoker. I've e-mailed it to PartyPoker as well. AddedMoney1 bennydale111 big_colonel bound_away cloudy_bay ducks_nuts fair_dingkum flying_spur frames_depot Gabriel6661 GoldenGus gunsmoked333 HelicoptLeo Liguria111 Mads080205 mes_ami miss_meidy pagliaccio_ prime_move Prometheus42 roball111 RoccoSuper sanddance simon_sez555 stabber555 Starway successor111 tuckerrain tawriffic WonderW_72 vallyvally [/ QUOTE ] HOLY CRAP. im actually listed there!!! rofl [/ QUOTE ] So you are a scamming cheat bot user? |
|
#178
|
|||
|
|||
|
lets see your stats. don't have to share your name but are you defending your BB that much?
I guess there goes my theory that it would be highly unlikely for an outsider to get lumped into the group. |
|
#179
|
|||
|
|||
|
I dont really get it why you are complaining.
a) You say they all have the same stats, so its easy for u to determine if one is a bot or not. b) Since they all have the same stats, they play the same style(!) and never seem to change styles. => So, just analyze their playing style (u have that many hands of them, that this would not be that hard!), and u then not only know how one player plays, you know how many "players" play... then get on the tables, and take their money. So actually if u are right and those peoples are bot, then make the best of it... analyze their play, and crush them. If u exactly know how a specific player reacts in a specififc situation, you could always outplay them... So where is your problem? |
|
#180
|
|||
|
|||
|
[ QUOTE ]
So where is your problem? [/ QUOTE ] The problem is: a) They are taking up seats, that could be inhabited by players, who are worse. b) They are winning, which means, that they are helping the real fish bust sooner. Also if it becomes a wellknown fact, that this happens, it will scare away the real customers in the long run. |
![]() |
|
|