![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Is 70% ITM possible and sustainable? 75%? 80%?
What do you think? |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
100% is possible if you win every game...
|
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
I think 100% is not realistic in the longrun because they suck out from time to time. But may be 75%?
|
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
63% i think would be good.
I got an 80% winrate on stars $11, but I havent played much. Don't expect it to last. |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
Ignore roommate's joke. The standard wisdom is that 60% is achievable and sustainable at most levels (up to and including the $200s). At the lower levels, I would certainly contend that 65% is sustainable. Anything above that and I think you can consider yourself on a hot streak. About 220 games is considered a reasonable number for drawing meaningful statistical conclusions from.
Good luck. |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
how penguin, I have played exactly 221 games at the 20's and 10's. winrate is 62.44%. I also know that it could be higher if I am able to stop making so many mistakes.
|
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
I have learned from analyzing my games that some of the shots I call "mistakes" when they dont work out and I lose, also greatly contribute to my wins....Like making some outlandish raise on the flop or turn in big-ish pots and I get called down by someone with an overpair or set, while in some scenarios it lands me the pot when they fold and I win a big pot with air, tilt my opponent and snap him off w middle pair three hands later.
The only REAL mistake I think you should consistently avoid is getting tilted/infuriated by the play of your opponent. And that's a tough assignement. Goldmund |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
60% is considered standard as a good winrate, 65% is considered VERY good, 70% EXTREMELY difficult, but attainalble by the very best players on the lower levels. A winrate of 70%+ is called running hot. Goldmund
|
![]() |
|
|