![]() |
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
well, u arent getting horrible odds too call right there, u need about 2:1 right there too call if all your cards are live, u said u were getting 1.9:1 so thats pretty much the same thing and if u think that u can win a lot more by tilting him then i dont think its neccessarly a horrible play, and its a call i might consider making hoping my outs are live. And even if he wins he might be a lot more willing too give u action later when u do flop a huge hand because he prolly wont respect ur game. Also, calling off is something that should be avoided, if u were the shover in this spot it would be a lot better since u would have some fold equity.
|
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
|
fold he has redraws likely
|
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
|
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] since when is 33/22 a good TAG? [/ QUOTE ] Meh, I'm don't consider rigid borderlines between TAG/LAG etc. Whatever you want to call a 33/22/2.9 that's seemingly a good player it's fine by me. [/ QUOTE ] You understand the T in TAG is for tight though right? |
|
#14
|
|||
|
|||
|
Call it's more fun that way.
|
|
#15
|
|||
|
|||
|
Pfft, whatever, you're barely losing money. Just type GAMBOOOOOOOOLL in the chat box, and call. Nobody will bluff you for a while.
|
|
#16
|
|||
|
|||
|
[ QUOTE ]
You understand the T in TAG is for tight though right? [/ QUOTE ] Yes, but what's the G stand for? [img]/images/graemlins/wink.gif[/img] I was more worried that people would equate LAG with "bad player" when that's not neccessarily the case. I'm sure I dont need to tell you that you can have an excellent player and an awful player both with the exact same 33/22 stats. |
|
#17
|
|||
|
|||
|
Fold, lots of the time you will be againest a bigger flush draw/set etc. and really bad shape.
|
|
#18
|
|||
|
|||
|
[ QUOTE ]
Fold, lots of the time you will be againest a bigger flush draw/set etc. and really bad shape. [/ QUOTE ] Yep I already accounted for basically the worst case scenario in the Pokerstove equity in the original post. |
|
#19
|
|||
|
|||
|
Interesting post. As it's 6 handed, you don't know how long he will play, and you don't know he is prone to tilt in any case I tend to think you cannot expect to get the equity back. It's not like there is a huge fish with a big stack at the table and you wanted to increase the effective stack against them. Still, it's not the worst call and I'm sure I've made a lot worse [img]/images/graemlins/cool.gif[/img]
|
|
#20
|
|||
|
|||
|
[ QUOTE ]
Interesting post. As it's 6 handed, you don't know how long he will play, and you don't know he is prone to tilt in any case I tend to think you cannot expect to get the equity back. It's not like there is a huge fish with a big stack at the table and you wanted to increase the effective stack against them. Still, it's not the worst call and I'm sure I've made a lot worse [img]/images/graemlins/cool.gif[/img] [/ QUOTE ] Yeah but it's not a huge amount of equity either. We figure to be around the high 20's and need 34% for break-even. |
![]() |
|
|