|
|
#12
11-01-2006, 11:49 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Too risky?
This seems like one of those hands where you need 10$ to break even on the day, and you're just thinking "god damnit I'm winning this next pot no matter what."
|
|
#16
11-02-2006, 12:01 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Too risky?
Hero heard Doyle say on TV that he doesn't need cards to win, he plays the players not the cards, so he was giving it a shot.
|
|
#17
11-02-2006, 12:05 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Too risky?
[ QUOTE ]
Ummm regardless of the risk-to-reward, tell me why I'm not repping a strong hand? Do you never c/r a good player who will bet this flop almost always? [/ QUOTE ] dude i think converter messed up, otherwise u are spewing hardcore.
|
|
#18
11-02-2006, 12:07 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Too risky?
All sarcasm aside, the funny thing about NL is that you can always convince yourself that there's no such thing as a "bad" play. Only a "shot" that doesn't work out. You called a double-pot-sized raise with a gutshot straight on a paired board. Just so you chould check-raise it away from the guy on the river??!?
It seems that most ppl in this thread are telling you that it's a spew. Take that for whatever you think it's worth. I'm beginning to think this was not a serious post.
|
|
#19
11-02-2006, 12:07 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Too risky?
No it could easily be a spew, that's why I'm running it by you guys. Basically I think he almost always bets the river, so essentially this is just a more costly (but with greater reward) rebluff, and I thought it was a better bluff line than a turn 3-bet.
|
|
#20
11-02-2006, 12:22 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Too risky?
well in that case i just can't understand why u would think hes gonna be bluffing this turn v often. i would fold to the turn rz, but i guess if you really think hes bluffing then this line is pretty hot as opposed to a turn 3-bet. but, as i said before i would fold turn and to be honest i wouldn't even have bet out to begin with.
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
