Poker Ethics Question

[Albert Moulton]

If it's a no limit game, I'd probably either fold or reraise to isolate the all-in shorty.

But, as played, I like betting to protect your hand better than trying to "check it down." You're no where near the money. You don't want to give any free cards. I like betting out here. It really isn't an ethical question for me at all. You're just playing your hand well in an effort to win the most chips possible so you can win the game.

[Mr.Slip]

"But what is silly is when players bluff the third player out with a hand that is extremely unlikely to beat the all-in guy without improvement. For example, don't semi-bluff with 45 on a 67K flop. If you know the other guy out and don't improve then you're just helping the all-in player stay in the tourney."

this is the only point that really matters here. bluffing or semi-bluffing into a dry pot to isolate against an ALL-IN player is ALWAYS the wrong move.

every other situation demands individual inspection.

best,
~Slip

[GodPlays_Pkr]

This is retarted. Just check it down and knock out the player...