![]() |
|
#41
|
|||
|
|||
|
Gary Jones has done live commentary on tournaments in the UK.
|
|
#42
|
|||
|
|||
|
what's the reason for this rule? Some form of collusion deterent?
|
|
#43
|
|||
|
|||
|
It changes the dynamic for the other players. For example, let's say it's three-way. The guy to the folder's left no longer has a "squeeze" position for a bluff.
|
|
#44
|
|||
|
|||
|
The meta-rule is, you should never do anything that might affect the action in a pot you are not in, or do not plan to contest.
|
|
#45
|
|||
|
|||
|
I would love to be there if Alan beats Corp. Mike.
|
|
#46
|
|||
|
|||
|
What are the blinds going to be in the Alan/CMike contest?
|
|
#47
|
|||
|
|||
|
thanks for the explanation, I guess it has never occured to me to fold w/ no action so never thought about the consequences.
|
|
#48
|
|||
|
|||
|
Corporation Mike would annihilate Alan HU - Alan plays his cards, Corp. Mike plays other people's cards. Corp. Mike is a big favorite if there aren't escalating blinds.
Would Alan have any clue how to play heads-up? Value-betting 2nd pair? Bluffing optimally? He's run sick good and plays a decent 10 handed ring game, but shorthanded he would get crushed for being too loose and too passive. |
|
#49
|
|||
|
|||
|
Didn't your momma ever tell you it's not nice to tell secrets?
|
|
#50
|
|||
|
|||
|
For $5,000 buyin: I'd say just put it all in first hand, since that's what's going to happen anyways.
|
![]() |
|
|