Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > Internet Gambling > Internet Gambling
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #41  
Old 09-07-2006, 05:31 PM
Ron Burgundy Ron Burgundy is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: ronpaul2008.com
Posts: 5,208
Default Re: Dishonest 2+2er: ImsaKidd

OP,

Could you link to where these rules of etiquette for RAF bonuses are written down? If I ever do one with some whiny noob, I'll know what is expected of me, and can avoid retarded flame threads.

Thanks.
Reply With Quote
  #42  
Old 09-07-2006, 05:31 PM
bobhalford bobhalford is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 2,519
Default Re: Dishonest 2+2er: ImsaKidd

[ QUOTE ]
Why should imsakidd have to do this if you are the one that hadn't received credit for the bonus.

he was pretty relaxed about it apparently and said, "Look, I can't pay you until they pay me. Are you sure you have played enough there?"
And you seemed to be like, "OMG YES YES YES!! Give me my damn money already."


I'm not sure the etiquette for these things either, but it seems like blaming him for Pacific's mistake is kind of silly.

[/ QUOTE ]

Well, I had played there pretty extensively, so I know I had enough to clear the bonus. Knowing that, and seeing that ImsaKidd didn't seem at all interested in getting the money (he was getting $100 out of the $150, so he had more to gain than me). Initially, I had wanted that we split the $175 50/50, but he wanted more because he had to play to clear the bonus. I didn't realize until yesterday that I too had to play 888 hands for this to work as well. Had I known that I wouldn't have agreed to only getting $50. But that's neither here nor there.

So anyway, that's what led me to believe that he was being dishonest. He appeared unconcerned about it, even though something was wrong. Had I known about the $25 bonus that I hadn't gotten and that we both get credited at the same time, I would have done what I did today a few months ago.

So I think I got frustrated with what appeared to be a "ha ha I got the cash and I'm keepin it" with all the knowledge I had at the time combined with his attitude towards the whole thing.
Reply With Quote
  #43  
Old 09-07-2006, 07:24 PM
livinitup0 livinitup0 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Go ahead....run
Posts: 1,698
Default Re: Dishonest 2+2er: ImsaKidd

Imsa has no reason to screw you out of $50.00. I think thats about 0.003% of his bankroll...I dont think he's that hard up....also Imsa seems like a really cool kid and has contributed a lot to this board. I know from personal experience that he has no problems helping fellow 2'ers out.

Like everyone else has said he doesnt have to give you crap until YOU prove that you fulfilled all the bonus requirements. I will be PMing someone to have this thread deleted, as Imsa...nor anyone on 2p2 should have to tolerate blatent public attacks against their character.
Reply With Quote
  #44  
Old 09-07-2006, 10:08 PM
Abe Abe is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: 2+2 poster since 1998
Posts: 434
Default Re: Dishonest 2+2er: ImsaKidd

[ QUOTE ]
Ok - I've sorted the whole thing out today.

I erroneously believed that ----
I just recalled having ---
I figured was ---
I apparently had not ---
Apologies to ImsaKidd for the thread. I wasn't as clear on the bonus protocol that sites use (and I've never done a RAF bonus before so I didn't realize that my bonus would be credited at the same time as his).

If ImsaKidd wants me to, I can create a new thread to clear his name. He is not dishonest. But I definitely would not recommend him as someone to share a RAF bonus with.

[/ QUOTE ]

I would share a RAF bonus with ImsaKidd anyday. He's a smart, polite, young guy. I've played live poker with him and had another financial transation that shows me he is trustworthy.

Now - bobhalford - what shoud we think of YOU? After this episode, should someone recommend sharing a bonus with you? btw, your post (quoted above) is pretty funny.
Reply With Quote
  #45  
Old 09-08-2006, 02:39 AM
Blowup Doll Blowup Doll is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: The Whore\'s Whisperer
Posts: 2,277
Default Re: Dishonest 2+2er: ImsaKidd

OP, Instead of calling support right away and figuring out that it was YOU who [censored] up, you instead come here and libel a solid poster. I'd do an RAF bonus share with Imsakidd any day of the year. I'd never do one with you after seeing how you operate in this thread.
Reply With Quote
  #46  
Old 09-08-2006, 03:14 AM
MS Sunshine MS Sunshine is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: easy chair
Posts: 2,204
Default Re: Dishonest 2+2er: ImsaKidd

[ QUOTE ]
FWIW, slandering someone else in the Zoo means next to nothing in the long run, so don't sweat it too much.

[/ QUOTE ]
Reply With Quote
  #47  
Old 09-08-2006, 08:13 AM
MannyIsGod MannyIsGod is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 627
Default Re: Dishonest 2+2er: ImsaKidd

Heh, OP sucks.
Reply With Quote
  #48  
Old 09-08-2006, 08:23 AM
Dangeresque Dangeresque is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Heartattack at 1-2 Limit
Posts: 1,013
Default Re: Dishonest 2+2er: ImsaKidd

"I'm shocked! Shocked! To find flawed customer service on pacific poker!"

"Here is your unmentionable sir."

"Thank you."
Reply With Quote
  #49  
Old 09-08-2006, 12:15 PM
Alobar Alobar is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: spite shoving minraises
Posts: 17,702
Default Re: (False accusation later retracted/MH) Dishonest 2+2er: ImsaKidd

OP should be banned
Reply With Quote
  #50  
Old 09-08-2006, 07:28 PM
SoloAJ SoloAJ is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Illinois State
Posts: 3,942
Default Re: (False accusation later retracted/MH) Dishonest 2+2er: ImsaKidd

[ QUOTE ]
OP should be banned

[/ QUOTE ]

I agree with this. I also think it is hilarious that he thought he couldn't talk to support about this because he doesn't know Imsa's mother's maiden name. Awesome.

Also, as I was reading this entire thread just now...when he used the word 'slander' I was hoping this thread would hijack into a libel/slander discussion...it sort of did. Also awesome.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:27 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.