Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > Tournament Poker > Tournament Circuit/WSOP
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #101  
Old 08-08-2006, 03:35 PM
alvaroaze alvaroaze is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 575
Default Re: Jamie Gold Info

Mark Garner Eliminated 25th ($494,797)
Mark Garner raises $200,000 before the flop in early position only to be re-raised all-in by Dustin Holmes out of the big blind. Holmes has Garner covered, and Garner makes the call flipping over 5heart5club. Holmes shows AdiamondAclub, and the board comes Kspade7heart6spadeQclub4spade, no help to either player. Garner is eliminated in 25th place and will receive $494,797. After this hand, Dustin Holmes now has $1,845,000.

edit: i was wondering why the short stack raised to 200k from EP with only 650k left. then i checked pokerstarsblog and everything makes sense
Dustin Holmes raises, Mark Garner, qualifier from Little Rock, Arkansas moves all in, Holmes calls with pocket aces. Garner has pocket fives. The board ran out K67Q4. Garner is out in 25th place.
Reply With Quote
  #102  
Old 08-08-2006, 03:35 PM
damaniac damaniac is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Looking for law jobs
Posts: 2,917
Default Re: Jamie Gold Info

What are the blinds/antes at right now?
Reply With Quote
  #103  
Old 08-08-2006, 03:36 PM
alvaroaze alvaroaze is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 575
Default Re: Jamie Gold Info

25k/50k a5k
Reply With Quote
  #104  
Old 08-08-2006, 03:36 PM
Jourdain Jourdain is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 1,483
Default Re: Jamie Gold Info

[ QUOTE ]
What are the blinds/antes at right now?

[/ QUOTE ]

ROUND: 27 BLINDS: 25000/50000 ANTE: 5000
Reply With Quote
  #105  
Old 08-08-2006, 03:37 PM
aeest400 aeest400 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: valuetown...how\'d i get here?
Posts: 482
Default Re: Jamie Gold Info

Agreed that it wouldn't be a great "everyman" story, but at this point poker could use a serious image booste given the recent House bill. Thus, it would be nice if a "model citizen" won it and all the networks covered the charity angle. (Even though I'm not normally a fan of douchy billionaires).
Reply With Quote
  #106  
Old 08-08-2006, 03:37 PM
Jeremy517 Jeremy517 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 3,083
Default Re: Jamie Gold Info

[ QUOTE ]
EDIT: TWO bustouts in 20 minutes??? I feel like we're watching the Stars Sunday Million.

[/ QUOTE ]

They were short stacks, with Ms around 5. What did you expect them to do?
Reply With Quote
  #107  
Old 08-08-2006, 03:37 PM
Dynasty Dynasty is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 16,088
Default Re: Jamie Gold Info

[ QUOTE ]
I think only 1 left with under 1m left.

[/ QUOTE ]

It's actually 2.

21. Fred Goldberg 1,611,000

22. Luke Chung 1,100,000

23. Sirous Jamshidi 940,000

24. Paul Wasicka 700,000
Reply With Quote
  #108  
Old 08-08-2006, 03:37 PM
Matt Flynn Matt Flynn is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Badugi, USA
Posts: 3,285
Default Re: WSOP Day 7 Main Event Thread

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]

if you take all those chip counts and add them up, you get 88,226,000 chips. if 8,773 players started, then we should have 87,730,000 in play. how did we get an extra 496,000 chips in play?!

racing off chips really add that much? that's some serious chip dumping from other tournaments, no?!

[/ QUOTE ]


All the chips going all in so much produces tremendous heat from all the friction bewtween them and the felt (on the order of 2.5 donks^chips/erg). Energy = heat and, as evident from relativity, mass and energy are one and this energy is converted to mass and then converted to chips.

Its the fundamental law of thermodonkanamics.

[/ QUOTE ]

Excellent.
Reply With Quote
  #109  
Old 08-08-2006, 03:38 PM
Dynasty Dynasty is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 16,088
Default Re: WSOP Day 7 Main Event Thread

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]


Its the fundamental law of thermodonkanamics.

[/ QUOTE ]

Excellent.

[/ QUOTE ]

I think it's time to retire the term donkey in all its forms.
Reply With Quote
  #110  
Old 08-08-2006, 03:38 PM
Solitare Solitare is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 428
Default Re: Jamie Gold Info

[ QUOTE ]
Some millionaire/billionaire guy winning it all would not be "good" for poker (as far as quality of games/bringing in new players). It would be a good PR boost for poker's image, with the charity aspect and all.

But thew hole "everyday joe wins millions in poker tourney" captures the publics imagination more than "random billionaire wins WSOP"

If you heard Bill Gates won for example alot of people would be liek "BS" etc.

[/ QUOTE ]
Poker has plenty of players. Right now, I think poker needs good PR more than additional players, considering the legislative environment.

What I would like to see is the best spokesman possible for poker. Someone who would represent a good face for poker and actively promote the virtues of poker to the public, media, elected representatives, etc.

I don't know if Einhorn is that guy. But playing the tournament for charity shows his heart is in a good place. Having the connections to bring MJF to watch the final table shows that he is PR savvy. He's a successful businessman, not some online poker kid.

It's possible that he could be very good for poker.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:52 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.