Unpopular opinions that you hold

[Evan]

[ QUOTE ]
Evan:

[ QUOTE ]
un·pop·u·lar

Lacking general approval or acceptance.

[/ QUOTE ]

If we took a poll on OOT I'd bet LA >> NYC would prove to be unpopular.

-Al

[/ QUOTE ]
Would you call something that lost 49/51 unpopular?

[Georgia Avenue]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
People under the age of eight are, on an individual basis, consistently more enjoyable to hang out with than the eight+ crowd, but this phenomenon quickly falls apart once you have any kind of a group going.


[/ QUOTE ]

You're a pretty creppy dude.

[/ QUOTE ]

Yeah, well, you're [censored]' Dead, so everybody hates you.

[/ QUOTE ]

lol X lol

Also:

[ QUOTE ]
a dedication to one's own integrity

[/ QUOTE ]

I'm not sure this is quite so great of a personal quality, Mr Cards...
Integrity should be gritty, or second nature...not something one is continually mindful of...The best dedication is to others, not your own needs.

Have you read le Misanthrope? Surely you have...AH but have you read Le Bourgeois Gentilhomme?

Also, have you read it: Ennui'd?
--GA

[Aloysius]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Chicken thighs >>>>>> chicken breasts


[/ QUOTE ]

im baffled.

rj

[/ QUOTE ]

Better flavor, better texture, easier to cook, not dry. Simple.

[/ QUOTE ]

Probably implicit in the above, but skin-meat ratio much better.

Evan - you think it'd be that close? Huh, well good then.

-Al

[djoyce003]

[ QUOTE ]
Wow. Most critics like Aliens, I believe.

Number 2 is just flat-out wrong.

And number 3 is not unpopular.

Think harder next time, champ.

[/ QUOTE ]

aliens was used as an example (feel free to insert random Sci-fi, horror, or action movie in place of it) Use your imagination sheesh.

#2 is an opinion, sorry you disagree (incorrectly I might add), but it's an opinion nonetheless...by definition it can't be "wrong." Try harder [censored].

[kyro]

Andrew Karpinski isn't nearly as annoying as he once was and the only reason people still harrass him is because it's the in thing to do.

[Yoplait, BIMO]

The degree to which you exaggerated #2 makes it wrong regardless of whether you see it as an opinion or not.

[djoyce003]

[ QUOTE ]
The degree to which you exaggerated #2 makes it wrong regardless of whether you see it as an opinion or not.

[/ QUOTE ]

Hence it was an unpopular opinion....at least with liberal morons. How you can even argue that it's incorrect after they've been busted posting fake stories by authors etc is laughable. Their fact checking is only slightly better than Dan Rather's.

[The DaveR]

[ QUOTE ]
#2 is an opinion, sorry you disagree (incorrectly I might add), but it's an opinion nonetheless...by definition it can't be "wrong." Try harder [censored].

[/ QUOTE ]

It's not an opinion. The Times routinely gets stories right. The often spoken criticisms, true or not, are not about accuracy. They are about bias. To conflate any competent newspaper with a tabloid that deliberately makes up stories is retarded.

[The DaveR]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
The degree to which you exaggerated #2 makes it wrong regardless of whether you see it as an opinion or not.

[/ QUOTE ]

Hence it was an unpopular opinion....at least with liberal morons. How you can even argue that it's incorrect after they've been busted posting fake stories by authors etc is laughable. Their fact checking is only slightly better than Dan Rather's.

[/ QUOTE ]

Newspapers don't have fact checkers. Writers verify accuracy and show their notes to editors.

Magazines have fact checkers.

[Evan]

[ QUOTE ]

Evan - you think it'd be that close? Huh, well good then.

-Al

[/ QUOTE ]
No.