Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > General Poker Discussion > News, Views, and Gossip
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #211  
Old 06-01-2006, 01:41 PM
burningyen burningyen is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: avoiding practice
Posts: 2,324
Default Re: Alan Goerhing

[ QUOTE ]
Alan,

I'm just interested why you ended up calling with K8os for the tournament?

[/ QUOTE ]
I get hives when people post in a thread without reading it first.
Reply With Quote
  #212  
Old 06-01-2006, 01:43 PM
Riverman Riverman is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 3,032
Default Re: Alan Goerhing

Alan,

If you haven't already given up on 2+2, thanks for sharing your insights. For every one of the clowns hijacking this thread there are 100 posters who are appreciative of the opportunity to hear your thoughts.
Reply With Quote
  #213  
Old 06-01-2006, 02:19 PM
Whose2know Whose2know is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Maryland
Posts: 481
Default Re: Alan Goerhing

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Alan,

I'm just interested why you ended up calling with K8os for the tournament?

[/ QUOTE ]
I get hives when people post in a thread without reading it first.

[/ QUOTE ]

I get hives when people make posts about NOTHING/DO NOTHING TO HELP/ANSWER THE QUESTION!


I skimmed thru the whole 20 pages of this thing and just saw bickering b/w smoothcall & others. If I missed it I apologize.
Reply With Quote
  #214  
Old 06-01-2006, 02:22 PM
Whose2know Whose2know is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Maryland
Posts: 481
Default Re: Alan Goerhing

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]

I watched the Wed broadcast headup action again just now. I had forgotten how beside himself Sexton was trying to figure out and explain to Vince (and the viewers) how Alan could have played that K8o for $6 million in chips.

[/ QUOTE ]

You might want to read Goehring's explanation for a context of the situation:

http://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/sh...Number=5953614

[/ QUOTE ]

Whoa, undiscovered gem from that thread:

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
heh I thought the idea around here was not to be results oriented

[/ QUOTE ]

Sorry, you are right. My old habit of playing bad and winning money is nothing more than a vicious addiction that feeds on itself and can not be easily broken. Note to self-----seek help immediatley.

[/ QUOTE ]

[/ QUOTE ]

okk now I see. Makes sense to me for the call.
Reply With Quote
  #215  
Old 06-01-2006, 03:59 PM
MicroBob MicroBob is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: The cat is back by popular demand.
Posts: 29,344
Default Re: Alan Goerhing

I finally got around to this thread (skimmed parts of it naturally).

Some interesting stuff.

(and some annoying stuff in there too).

Alan - I think much of 2+2 would be very happy if you stuck around and continued to share your insights.

If you missed it being mentioned in this gigantic thread, Smoothcall has been banned mostly because his past behavior and inabilities to 'play well with others' has been similar in the past to his performance in this thread.


I too would be curious to further discuss the 'left-handed' aspect and am almost tempted to start a new thread about it (although I'm not sure if that would be appropriate or not).

Left-handedness runs in my family at almost a 50% rate.
My Dad and I are left-handed.
Both of my grandmothers are/were lefties.
The list goes on.

I hope you choose to return to this thread (or a new one) and elaborate on your thoughts regarding left-handedness and potential for poker success with unorthodox styles.
Reply With Quote
  #216  
Old 06-01-2006, 04:37 PM
suzzer99 suzzer99 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: guuhhhn inner nets
Posts: 13,634
Default Re: Alan Goerhing

Would have been nice if VVP or Sexton would have at least mentioned Quach was pushing a lot prior to the K8 call. 10-12BB opponent pushing every other hand, that's a marginal but good call. Instead they make Goehring look like an idiot for drama. Lame.
Reply With Quote
  #217  
Old 06-01-2006, 05:24 PM
kutuz_off kutuz_off is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: New York City
Posts: 1,953
Default Re: Alan Goerhing

[ QUOTE ]
Would have been nice if VVP or Sexton would have at least mentioned Quach was pushing a lot prior to the K8 call. 10-12BB opponent pushing every other hand, that's a marginal but good call. Instead they make Goehring look like an idiot for drama. Lame.

[/ QUOTE ]

Sorry, but you don't belong to their target audience, I suppose.
Reply With Quote
  #218  
Old 06-01-2006, 05:27 PM
Whose2know Whose2know is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Maryland
Posts: 481
Default Re: Alan Goerhing

[ QUOTE ]
Would have been nice if VVP or Sexton would have at least mentioned Quach was pushing a lot prior to the K8 call. 10-12BB opponent pushing every other hand, that's a marginal but good call. Instead they make Goehring look like an idiot for drama. Lame.

[/ QUOTE ]


Yup, and I in part believed it. It was almost an instacall, but K 8 is def in the top teir of hands here esp. if Quach is pushing almost every button.
Reply With Quote
  #219  
Old 06-01-2006, 07:55 PM
AsYouWish AsYouWish is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 148
Default Re: I am putting 2 to1 on Smoothcall in Heads Up Match vs Goering

[ QUOTE ]
I still cannot believe you would ban Qbit he was stating facts and not going for the hype. But something has to be wrong when you ban all of them but I guess that is your decision.

[/ QUOTE ]

Over/under on Smoothcall + aliases + new accounts in this thread before it ever ends?

Right now, we're at 3 (Smoothcall, Qbit, MightyQbitbanned). I'll set the O/U at 6.
Reply With Quote
  #220  
Old 06-01-2006, 10:03 PM
wisehandpoker wisehandpoker is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: twoplustwo
Posts: 2,326
Default Re: I am putting 2 to1 on Smoothcall in Heads Up Match vs Goering

There's a good portion of the WPT audience that doesn't know that there are hands between those televised, doesn't understand why the players start with uneven stacks etc. As I understand it, the WPT commentary doesn't exceed the scope of their televised hands because they don't want to alienate those viewers with the complexities of tournament play.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:01 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.