![]() |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Lets say I got this scenario:
Bookies1: NBA- PHI +5.5 -110 CHI -5.5 -110 Bookies2: NBA- PHI +4.5 +110 CHI -4.5 -120 How do I calculate the percent edge the bookies or bettor has, while factoring in the line discrepencies? All help is appreciated. Please show math. |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
This is not a profitable middle. Not even close.
|
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
I'm assuming Bookie2 is Pinnacle, and this is the better line on both sides. If you want to make sure, look at the drop-down box and compare the prices at the other spread.
|
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
profitable NBA middles are generally no more than 5c combined juice per half point. so for example, I would play +5.5 -110 if there was -4.5 +100 available. most of the time, good plays require to you take open leads and wait for the steam to blow the line further down before closing.
|
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
OK....so How do I calculate the percent edge the bookies or bettor has, while factoring in the line discrepencies?
If the spread is the same i think you do it like this: Bookies1: NBA- PHI +5.5 -110 CHI -5.5 -110 Bookies2: NBA- PHI +5.5 +110 CHI -5.5 -120 Highest odds PHI: Bookies2=PHI with +110 Highest odds CHI: Bookies1=CHI with -110 PHI +110 = 11/10 = 110 CHI -110 = 10/11 = 90.91 110 + 90.91 = 200.91 200/200.91 = 99.55% or a .45% combined profit to the arb better Is this correct? |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
[ QUOTE ]
Highest odds PHI: Bookies2=PHI with +110 Highest odds CHI: Bookies1=CHI with -110 PHI +110 = 11/10 = 110 CHI -110 = 10/11 = 90.91 110 + 90.91 = 200.91 200/200.91 = 99.55% or a .45% combined profit to the arb better Is this correct? [/ QUOTE ] no, because only one team can cover the same spread. the way you structured it, if the bulls win by 6 or more, you win $10, but if philly wins or loses by 5 or less, then you lose $9.09. |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Highest odds PHI: Bookies2=PHI with +110 Highest odds CHI: Bookies1=CHI with -110 PHI +110 = 11/10 = 110 CHI -110 = 10/11 = 90.91 110 + 90.91 = 200.91 200/200.91 = 99.55% or a .45% combined profit to the arb better Is this correct? [/ QUOTE ] no, because only one team can cover the same spread. the way you structured it, if the bulls win by 6 or more, you win $10, but if philly wins or loses by 5 or less, then you lose $9.09. [/ QUOTE ] I was using the numbers for the calculations not bets, just as a proof of concept, given that situation you can have a win-win situation (although very small) if you balance your wagers properly. |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
|
![]() |
|
|