[kickabuck]

I'd have to agree that this post was in poor taste. Not necessarily because of the poster's fascination with Negreanu's sexuality, but by omitting the full text of Negreanu's comments he attempts(successfully I think) to instill in the mind of the reader the strong possibility that Negreanu is gay(not that there's anything wrong with that). So the casual reader who doesn't read the blog or a lot of this thread gets this impression, and I don't think that is really fair to Negreanu or the reader regardless how one views the importance of Daniel's sexuality.