[Michaelson]

[ QUOTE ]
"even if all that is true, what do they say about the fact that they had no software that flagged suspicious play or that they didn't realize that the hand histories trumped any computer engineer's opinion about the possibility of seeing hole card's?"

[/ QUOTE ]

Wait, AP had poor systems in place to detect cheating?

Pretty much everyone who has taken a cursory interest in this case knew that three weeks ago. With all due respect, you're clearly way behind the 8-ball when it comes to the pertinent issues of this case. Given what we all know about the cheating at AP, what you clearly consider to be your key insight into the matter is in fact just inane.

The most fiercely debated point of contention since we all discovered that AP cheated and covered it up has been whether or not it is in any individual's interests, or the interests of online poker in general, that people continue to play at there. On that front, you stated categorically that you believe there is nothing that can be achieved by boycotting AP, and that the principles at stake don't warrant it either. Now that's fine, and everyone's entitled to their own opinions, but don't act surprised when that is the part of your post that gets peoples attention, not your startling observation that AP's security system was exploitable.