[jeffnc]

[ QUOTE ]
The nuts are defined by the board. That's it.

[/ QUOTE ]

Wrong. If the board is AAK, and we have AK, we know we have the nuts. According to you, we might be behind here.

Consider. We know for a fact that our opponent will only go all in if he has the nuts. Our opponent goes all in. According to you we should fold this hand because we don't have the nuts and he does. That's absurd and your opinion makes absolutely no sense in the real world.

edit: alright, this post proved nothing because you don't consider "unbeatable hand" to necessarily be the nuts. Point taken, but we still disagree :-)