Re: Does the PPA need 2+2?
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Also I just want to note how few posters are actually answering the question Berge created this thread for, i.e. does the PPA need 2+2, and if so how much. And note again that the question is NOT the reverse and whether 2p2 needs the PPA.
[/ QUOTE ]
I believe "the proof is in the pudding" so to speak. The PPA, starting with its former president Bolzerick (if I spelt his name correctly) has been all over this board for the past 15 months or so. We have also heard, sometimes privately, from a number of other people associated with them, including an attorney who originally organized the PPPA (which became the PPA) and one of their lobbyist. So based on that, and the fact that TE who announced he wasn't going to post here anymore is still posting, it appears that they believe they need us.
As for whether we need them, I think that's a little more debatable. We want to see a successful poker industry, and if the PPA helps in that area, it's good for us. On the other hand, we should remain a successful publishing company, though perhaps a smaller version of Two Plus Two, no matter what happens.
Best wishes,
Mason
[/ QUOTE ]
I never said I wouldn't post here anymore. I said I couldn't post non-PPA posts under the guidelines you initially laid out, which was accurate.
Why can't you comprehend that I don't represent the PPA?!?!!?!
I get the hint. Good bye.
[/ QUOTE ]
This is sad. In another thread a few hours ago, I posted how nice it was that Mason and TE had come to a rational resolution.
TE, you're a great asset here (despite that one unfortunate incident where you refused to distance yourself from the "ChristoNazi" talk, which, in my opinion, hurts our chances to win normal people over to our side).
But this is at least the third time you've said you're leaving; and yet you're still here. Are you really sure that you want to stick around?
|