View Single Post
  #43  
Old 11-09-2007, 01:44 PM
TheEngineer TheEngineer is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: USA
Posts: 2,730
Default Re: Antigua\'s WTO Case Getting Some Coverage

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Just happy to be here guys.

States rights and state sovereignty don't carry any weight here. The Constitution’s Supremacy Clause subordinates states’ rights to the national treaty power. When a nation enters into a treaty, it undertakes an international obligation that binds all of its organs (executive, legislative and judicial) and all its constituent jurisdictions (state and federal). A state is responsible for carrying out the obligations of an international agreement.

[/ QUOTE ]

Am I the only one who takes issue with a foreign entity dictating what laws we can or cannot make? While I may not agree with a state like Utah passing a law against gambling, I do defend there right to do so and I find any treaty or agreement made that hinders there right unacceptable.

[/ QUOTE ]

I believe in states' rights, and I do take issue with the willingness of our government to give away our rights via treaties like GATT. However, it's not like the WTO took these rights from our states. Rather, we gave them to the WTO.

I think the U.S. should honor its word. Again, it's not a foreign entity dictate; rather, it's an agreement the U.S. entered into voluntarily. The U.S. gives away many rights in treaties, especially ones on trade. The Senate is the body that represents states...that's why this is the body that ratifies treaties, I guess.
Reply With Quote