[Bobo Fett]

[ QUOTE ]
So there IS an appeals process. The appeal process for a US system after you have been founded guilty is "theoretical" as well.

[/ QUOTE ]
Wait, what??? What is "theoretical" about the appeals process in the US justice system?? Does the fact that people win their appeals every day not prove that an appeals process exists? Whereas on the other hand, I think you'll be hard pressed to find a single player who has appealed to the KGS and had a site's decision overturned.

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Yes, people accused of a crime, at least in the United States, have the right to know what evidence is being held against them. You're an imbecile. You're done talking.


[/ QUOTE ]

uh no, idiot. if the prosecuters showed the accused all of the evidence they have and what witnesses they have, the evidence/witnesses can become contaminated and the accused could readjust their story

[/ QUOTE ]
First of all, I'm pretty sure this is incorrect. I'm no legal expert, and I can't be bothered to search the web all day to find conclusive proof, but a quick search found me this blurb about UK law: "The prosecution, however, is under an obligation to disclose all its evidence to the defence". I'm pretty sure this is a cornerstone of most North American law. Even if I'm wrong on this, I'm sure the prosecution is at least required to disclose much of their evidence so a proper defence can be mounted. The poster you are replying to did not assert that all evidence needed to be disclosed, that's something you added.

Turtle, I really don't know where you're going with these posts half the time. One minute you make a good point, the next, you are trading insults with someone over points that you really seem to be on the ridiculous side of. Why the constant need to be berating everyone who disagrees with you? I think you need to spend a little more time thinking your posts through, and less time insulting everyone.