[Imrahil]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
I remember playing a superlag (100/70/4) on ongame a while ago. You could call like 2 overbets on 2 streets with A high vs that guy. It was pretty sick, also all the nits on the table didnt really adapt lol.

[/ QUOTE ]

I love how he's considered a "lag". I consider him a superaggrodonk.

[/ QUOTE ]

Yeah there's a "slight" difference between LAG and maniac...

[/ QUOTE ]

Well he was called a superlag but even then that doesn't explain how aggressive and terrible he is. A superlag sounds like a player who plays 40/25 but is actually decent.

[/ QUOTE ]
yes but the word 'LAG' means Loose aggressive. Well that guy was loose and he was aggressive. In this case SUPER loose aggressive. The word lag doesnt say anything about skill factor or not?

[/ QUOTE ]

When I think of LAG I think of a competent player for some reason. I just can't consider a 100/70 any type of LAG. Dunno, just me.