[Kimbell175113]

[ QUOTE ]
frankly w/o the histories, its just one guy steaming

[/ QUOTE ]
No one has ever said this is cold hard proof, but it is information, and it does change the estimates of some key probabilities. This thing more intricate by the moment with every new discovery, and we may need every clue we can get.

edit: I share suzzer's notion that it's silly, almost suspicious even, to single out this piece of evidence as different from the rest, when it so easily fits the likely story, method, and attitude of the alleged superaccounting activity.